Americans reconsider Korean proposal on missiles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Washington said yesterday it was prepared to take seriously a North Korean offer to scrap its nuclear missile programme, and that it would work with Moscow to pursue it.
Washington said yesterday it was prepared to take seriously a North Korean offer to scrap its nuclear missile programme, and that it would work with Moscow to pursue it.
The US assessment, made after a visit to Moscow by a State Department official, could clear the way for President Bill Clinton to postpone plans for a National Missile Defence system (NMD), known as "Son of Star Wars".
The North Korean offer was sprung on the US in July by President Vladimir Putin of Russia, who came from a meeting with the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il, saying he was prepared to abandon the missile programme in return for technological help.
Washington treated the offer as a Russian ploy to boost opposition to NMD, and US scepticism appeared justified when a South Korean paper quoted Mr Kim as later saying the offer was "a joke". Now, though, America has changed its tune.
Pentagon advocates of NMD have said it should be operational by 2005, the earliest, it was believed, North Korea would have a missile able to hit the US. To meet that timetable, construction would have to start this autumn; Mr Clinton is due to decide within weeks whether to approve it
With the presidential election two months away, he cannot afford to let Democrats appear soft on defence. Yet patchy test results and Russian warnings that the NMD would breach the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty have placed him in a quandary. Downgrading the perceived threat from Pyongyang could clinch the argument.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments