Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Artillery bombardment `defied orders'

Christopher Bellamy
Monday 22 April 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Israeli artillery which shelled the UN base at Qana in southern Lebanon, killing 110 Lebanese refugees, ignored the "safety ring" marked around UN bases, in defiance of standing orders, the Independent has learned.

The Israeli guns were firing at near-maximum range - 10 miles - and firing over the UN base at Hizbollah rocket launchers 300 yards to the north. At that range, Israeli sources said, the natural dispersion of shells in an elliptical pattern along the line of fire led some to fall short.

The UN military adviser to the Secretary-General, General Frank van Kappen, arrived in Beirut on Friday, the day after the Qana shelling, to conduct an investigation into the attack. He will also visit Jerusalem before submitting his report.

The UN said yesterday that six 155mm shells landed within the UN base. Between 50 and 70 shells landed in the Qana area during that day.

Israeli sources denied suggestions that the attack on the UN base was deliberate. Although both the UN and the Israeli Defence Forces have not yet completed formal investigations, it now looks likely that the artillery commander on the spot will be blamed for ignoring the safety margin around the known Fijian UN base at Qana and firing too hastily on the position from which Hizbollah had fired a number of BM-21 rockets.

It now seems clear that the Israelis fired as quickly as possible, to hit the Hizbollah gunners before they could escape, and did not fire ranging shots. Had the Hizbollah position been to one side of of the UN base, relative to the position of the guns, there might not have been a problem. However, the UN said the Hizbollah position was directly north of the UN base, only 300 yards away.

The M109A1 self-propelled howitzers used by the Israelis have a maximum range of about 18km, and were, according to Israeli sources, firing from 15km or 16 km. At that range, the shells will spread across a "beaten zone" along the line of fire. Some will land short or beyond the target.

Had the Israelis observed the "safety ring", they would not have risked some of the shells falling into the UN base. It appears that on this occasion a local commander may have ignored the standing orders which have a "safety ring" around each known UN site. The UN has had troops in the Qana base for 18 years.

According to UN sources in Lebanon, the Israeli shells were fitted with M732 radar fuses, which detonate them at 7m off the ground, the most lethal possible height, blasting fragments downwards to amputate, maim and kill.

The Israelis were using a US-built radar system, "Firefinder", to detect and plot the launch of the Hizbollah rockets. The radar will plot the position to within a ten-figure grid reference. This is then keyed into the fire control computer, which will produce settings for each of the guns distributed around the firing positions, so that their fire will converge on the target. However, at near- maximum range there will still be some dispersion. The Israeli sources also suggested the coordinates may not have been transcribed accurately.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in