White House: Trade deal with UK low priority after Brexit
President Trump may prioritise establishing a free trade agreement with Europe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Striking a trade deal with the UK after Brexit is a low priority for the Trump administration, the US commerce secretary has indicated.
Wilbur Ross cited the upcoming general election and negotiations between the UK and Europe as complicating factors that made establishing a deal between Britain and the US a low priority.
His comments, made to the Wall Street Journal, chime with recent reports suggesting Donald Trump sees establishing a free trade agreement with Europe as more important than establishing a free trade agreement with post-Brexit Britain – contrary to claims made by Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson earlier this year.
Back in January, Mr Johnson claimed the UK was “first in line” for a free trade deal with the US after the new President took office.
He said there would be “all kinds of opportunities” for a US-UK trade deal during a hastily arranged trip to Washington, where he hailed the incoming administration as bringing with it “a very exciting agenda of change”.
At the time President Trump seemed to back Mr Johnson, saying he wanted to sign a trade deal with Britain quickly because it was "good for both sides".
But during the EU referendum campaign, then-President Barack Obama warned exiting the union would send Britain to the back of the queue for a trade deal.
Last week, a source close to the White House reportedly told The Times that the Trump administration had come to a “realisation” that — as Mr Obama suggested — a deal with the EU was more important to US interests than a post-Brexit deal with Britain.
The source claimed Mr Trump changed his mind about prioritising Britain after Angela Merkel convinced him he should strike a deal with the EU first.
Just days before Mr Trump's "realisation", senior Republican Paul Ryan told Cabinet ministers the US was ready to forge an agreement with Britain “as soon as possible”, and would stand alongside its “special ally” during the Brexit process.
At a Policy Exchange event in London, Mr Ryan, the speaker of the US House of Representatives, added: “We think it's in everyone's interests to have a strong relationship between Britain and the EU, we want to, as soon as the UK is ready and able, to do a trade agreement, a bilateral trade agreement.”
But Mr Ross' comments seemed to support the reports of a shift in attitude.
Perhaps making excuses for pushing Britian aside, Mr Ross told The Wall Street Journal there could be “bandwidth issues” during UK-US talks because the countries had not negotiated a free-trade agreement “in a long, long time”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments