Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

We've no beef with Taco, says US law firm

Ap
Wednesday 20 April 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A law firm has withdrawn its class action that sought to force Taco Bell to stop calling the meat it serves "beef". The lawsuit alleged that what the fast-food company calls "seasoned beef" is a mixture containing non-meat ingredients to bind and bulk up the product and does not meet federal requirements to be labelled beef.

The fast-food chain said this week the allegations were "absolutely wrong" and the lawsuit was voluntarily withdrawn by the firm. It said no money was paid and it is not changing any of its products or advertising.

"This sets the record straight about the high quality of our seasoned beef and the integrity of our advertising," Taco Bell's chief executive, Greg Creed, said. "We took great exception to the false claims made about our seasoned beef and wish the attorneys had contacted us before filing and publicising a lawsuit that disparaged our brand."

The law firm Beasley Allen, based in Alabama, said it withdrew the lawsuit after Taco Bell made changes to its marketing and product disclosure.

"From the inception of this case, we stated that if Taco Bell would make certain changes regarding disclosure and marketing of its 'seasoned beef' product, the case could be dismissed," the attorney Dee Miles said. Taco Bell spent up to $4m in advertising to counter the accusations in the lawsuit, Mr Creed said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in