Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

One juror refuses to convict Michael Slager for killing Walter Scott

Deliberations will continue Monday

Justin Carissimo
New York
Saturday 03 December 2016 01:19 GMT
(AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jurors considering a murder charge against former police officer Michael Slager, who is white, for killing Walter Scott, an unarmed black motorist, were unable to reach a guilty verdict on Friday—thanks to one member of the jury.

In his defense, Mr Slager, 35, has argued that his mind felt like spaghetti when he shot Mr Scott, 50, who was at least 17-feet away from the officer, who was fired from his job following the release of cell phone video that captured the shooting. Prosecutors argued that the officer was not in danger since Mr Scott was clearly running in the opposite direction when he fired eight shots and struck the man with five bullets.

“It is clear that jurors will not be able to come to [a] consensus,” the panel told Judge Clifton Newman on Friday afternoon. Still, Judge Clifton urged jurors to make “every reasonable effort to reach a unanimous verdict” and to continue their deliberations on Monday.

At first, it seemed likely that the judge would declare a mistrial, but after one juror declined to convict the fired police officer for the April 2015 shooting, Judge Clinton said if he declares a mistrial, he would re-try the case with a new jury.

The shooting occurred after a traffic stop in April 2015 and the 12-member jury—made up of 11 white members and one black member—has heard five weeks of testimony from nearly 50 witnesses.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in