Victory for gun control advocates as US Federal judge largely upholds New York ban on assault weapons
Judge rules ban on some semi-automatic weapons does not violate the 2nd amendment, but strikes down provision limiting magazine capacity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A US federal judge has upheld New York's ban on military-style semiautomatic weapons handing a victory to gun control advocates.
Judge William M. Skretny of Federal District Court in Buffalo ruled that the ban on high capacity semi-automatic weapons does not violate the second amendment right to bear arms, as claimed by the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association.
In a 54-page document, Judge Skretny wrote:"Studies and data support New York’s view that assault weapons are often used to devastating effect in mass shootings."
The New York Safe Act, approved in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting where 20 children and six adults were killed, expanded the state's ban on semi-automatic weapons that resemble assault rifles and high-capacity magazines.
He also highlighted that the ban "applies only to a subset of firearms with characteristics New York State has determined to be particularly dangerous and unnecessary for self-defense; it does not totally disarm New York’s citizens; and it does not meaningfully jeopardize their right to self-defense."
Judge Skretny did, however, struck down a controversial provision limiting the number of bullets in a magazine to seven, which he described as "arbitrary".
Gun-rights supporters are expected to take the case to the US Supreme Court.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments