US state votes to end death penalty
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In a move anti-death penalty campaigners hailed as a sign of changing times, the New Hampshire legislature voted last night to abolish capital punishment and replace it with life imprisonment.
In a move anti-death penalty campaigners hailed as a sign of changing times, the New Hampshire legislature voted last night to abolish capital punishment and replace it with life imprisonment.
The vote made New Hampshire the first state of the Union to approve the repeal of the death penalty since the Supreme Court allowed the resumption of executions in 1976.
The Bill was passed by the state's lower house in March by a big majority and was adopted by a majority of 14 to 10 in the Senate yesterday. A similar Bill was rejected last year.
The practical significance of the vote is limited. New Hampshire is one of the smallest states in the US; it is widely regarded as a maverick and it also has one of the lowest murder rates in the country. The last time anyone in New Hampshire was executed was in 1939.
The vote does not even mean the removal of the death penalty from the statute book. The state governor, Jeanne Shaheen, supports the principle of execution. She made clear on the eve of the vote that she would veto the Bill - and the size of the majority in the Senate was not sufficient to override her veto.
The social and moral significance of the vote, however, is much greater. At very least it represents a change of the legislature's mood in the past 12 months. New Hampshire may also be more indicative of the national sentiment than is often believed. It only reinstated the death penalty in 1991, when public concern about crime was at its height nationally and "zero-tolerance" policing was gaining currency.
It could now be the first to register the reversal of that trend. One key to the shift is the advent of DNA testing, which helped to raise the exoneration rate of Death Row prisoners last year to its highest level.
Illinois declared a moratorium on executions last year after an inquiry found that as many as 13 innocent people were on the state's Death Row, and several other states have instituted inquiries.
A Gallup poll in February showed support for the death penalty nationwide at its lowest level for a decade, and last week a group of prominent lawyers launched a campaign to re-examine all aspects of the death penalty.
That proponents are also calling for such a review is evidence of concern within the legal profession that publicity about wrongful executions could undermine public confidence in the judicial process.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments