Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US says elections were 'flawed from the start'

Andrew Gumbel
Monday 27 June 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The US administration yesterday continued to pour scorn on the victory of President-elect Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the hardline former mayor of Tehran, making a further deterioration in the already threadbare diplomatic relationship between the Washington and Tehran apparently inevitable.

Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, capped weeks of hostile rhetoric by referring to a "mock election" and saying Mr Ahmadinejad was "no friend of democracy".

A State Department statement called the elections "flawed from the inception".

The US has been criticised since the first round of the Iranian presidential election because it dismissed the process rather than offer encouragement to the leading reformist candidate, Mostafa Moin, who came fifth and failed to make the run-off.

Many neoconservatives close to the administration have made clear they are interested in regime change, not reform, and during the campaign called Mr Moin a "pseudo-reformer" who might be more dangerous than the hardliners.

Some liberal commentators suggested it might suit Washington to have an unambiguously hardline leadership in Tehran because it would give the administration a pretext to shun all dialogue with a country President George Bush named in his "axis of evil".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in