Zuckerberg denies claim he did deal with Trump ahead of 2020 election
Claim of deal about fact-checking made in biography of venture capitalist Peter Thiel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has denied a reported claim that a deal was struck with former President Donald Trump regarding the fact-checking of political speech on the social media platform.
According to an extract of a new biography of venture capitalist Peter Thiel, The Contrarian, the alleged agreement was made during a White House dinner in 2019.
Writing in New York magazine, author Max Chafkin says that Mr Thiel joined Mr Zuckerberg, Jared Kushner, the president, and their spouses for dinner while on a trip to Washington DC to answer questions from Congress.
Mr Chafkin states that the specifics of the discussion were secret, but Mr Thiel later told a confidant that Mr Zuckerberg came to an understanding with Mr Kushner during the meal that Facebook would avoid fact-checking political speech.
This would allow the Trump campaign to claim whatever it wanted in the build-up to the 2020 election. In return, the Trump administration would lay off on any heavy-handed regulation of social media.
The alleged understanding brokered by MrThiel, Mr Chafkin writes, would see Facebook “push what the Thiel confidant called ‘state-sanctioned conservatism’”.
Mr Zuckerberg denied that there had been any deal with the Trump campaign, calling the notion “pretty ridiculous”, according to Mr Chafkin.
The author calls the denial “not entirely credible”, contrasting action taken by Twitter to restrict the president’s inflammatory posts during the election campaign with inaction by Facebook until after the 6 January insurrection.
However, Andy Stone, Facebook’s policy communications manager, tweeted: “The policy was announced before this dinner ever took place.”
He included examples of when the policy had been referred to in September 2019 and September 2018.
A spokesperson for Mr Thiel also denied the allegations in the book saying: “There was no deal, and no discussion of any deal. It never happened.”
Mr Chafkin frames Mr Zuckerberg as an acolyte of Mr Thiel, an early investor in Facebook, who he says “wrote the book on monopoly capitalism”.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments