US police chiefs denounce Donald Trump illegal immigration crackdown in open letter
61 senior police figures say Trump administration is wrong about so-called 'sanctuary' safe haven cities
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An alliance of 61 police chiefs have criticised the enforcement of Donald Trump’s immigration policies and are pleading for a change of tack.
In an open letter, the senior figures explain that if local police perform the “federal government’s” job by enforcing deportations, it will create "harm" in their communities.
Mr Trump has pledged to bring in local police forces to help with deporting millions of undocumented immigrants.
But this latest signal of defiance, which includes police chiefs from loyal Republican-aligned states, presents yet another stumbling block.
“Immigration enforcement is, first and foremost, a federal responsibility,” reads the letter, obtained by The Guardian.
“We believe that state and local law enforcement must work together with federal authorities to protect our communities and that we can best serve our communities by leaving the enforcement of immigration laws to the federal government.”
The chiefs stress that if the federal government force local police to help with national policy, and “sometimes problematic tasks”, it “undermines the delicate federal balance and will harm locally-based [and] community-orientated policing”.
The passage goes on to dumb down what is one of the US President’s most treasured policies, reading: “Deputies should prioritise threats such as dangerous criminals and criminal organisations causing harm.”
It goes on to slate the administration over its proposal to remove grant funding from forces which refuse to play ball.
“Threatening the removal of valuable grant funding from jurisdictions that choose not to spend limited resources enforcing federal immigration law is extremely problematic,” it reads.
“Removing these funds that contribute to the health and well-being of communities across the nation would not make our communities safer and would not fix any part of our broken immigration system.”
The 70-year-old billionaire businessman signed an executive order instructing the Department of Homeland Security to look at which of over 400 ‘sanctuary cities’, areas which offer a safe haven for America’s 11 million undocumented migrants, should lose funding.
“The issue of so-called sanctuary jurisdictions is a complex one,” it reads.
“There is no set definition of what comprise a ‘sanctuary jurisdiction’ and the term is often defined much too broadly.
“The term often sweeps in localities that engage in well-established community policing practices or follow federal court decisions that have found federal immigration detainers violate the constitution.”
It finishes: “We hope that this committee (US Senate committee on homeland security) will avoid taking actions that could harm community trust and make it harder for state and local law enforcement agencies to do our jobs.”
It is signed by Boston police commissioner William Evans, Los Angeles commander Jody Sharp, and Salt Lake City chief Mike Brown.
Mr Trump appeared to backpedal yesterday, telling journalists at lunch he was willing to “compromise” on a new immigration bill.
But he quickly followed up by telling Congress he will publish a regular list of crimes committed by immigrants.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments