Trump's spy chief testifies before Congress over Ukraine whistleblower scandal
'I believe that the whistleblower and the Inspector General have acted in good faith throughout'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump's acting head of National Intelligence is testifying before Congress amid allegations the president abused his office in an attempt to get Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 presidential election.
Joseph Maguire is appearing before the Democrat-controlled House intelligence committee, just minutes after a whistleblower's complaint against the president was made public.
The July phone call Mr Trump made to his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, in which he appeared to ask for political dirt on Joe Biden, one of his Democratic rivals in next year's election, has lead to an official impeachment inquiry to be launched against him.
Mr Maguire declined to discuss whether he spoke to the president about the complaint in question, saying his conversations with Mr Trump are “executive privilege”. He said the White House did not ask him to assert that privilege.
In his opening remarks, the acting spy chief said he welcomed Congress’ oversight duties, adding: “I am not partisan and I am not political”.
“In light of recent reporting on the whistle-blower complaint, I want to make clear that I have upheld my responsibility to follow the law every step of the way," he added.
The intelligence official also said he was “committed to protecting whistle-blowers and ensuring every complaint is handled appropriately”.
Prior to his public testimony, Mr Maguire denied explosive allegations published in the Washington Post that said he threatened to resign from his post if the White House administration attempted to stop him from testifying or forced him to “stonewall Congress”.
On Thursday, Mr Maguire described how he first heard of the whistleblower complaint in question, saying much of the complaint “was in fact subject to executive privilege”. He said he could not release the complaint until after the president chose to release a memorandum of his phone call with the Ukrainian president a day prior.
"Until executive privilege is determined and cleared, I did not have the authority to be able to send that forward to the committee," he said. “I believe this case is unique and unprecedented.”
He said the Justice Department told him the complaint did "not meet the statutory requirement of 'urgent concern,' and found I was not legally required to transmit material to the oversight committee."
He said he did not know the identity of the whistleblower, but when asked whether he believed the anonymous individual was a “partisan hack” as the president has said, Mr Maguire responded: “I think the whistleblower did the right thing.”
Mr Maguire described foreign election interference as “unwarranted,” adding: “It is unwelcome. It is bad for the nation.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments