Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

‘Nothing short of a betrayal’: What former Trump adviser Thomas Barrack is accused of doing

‘The conduct alleged in the indictment is nothing short of a betrayal of those officials in the United States, including the former President,’ the Department of Justice says

Nathan Place
New York
Wednesday 21 July 2021 00:42 BST
Comments
Trump ally Thomas Barrack arrested on federal charges
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Department of Justice has unveiled a lengthy indictment accusing Thomas Barrack, a former adviser to Donald Trump, of several federal charges, including conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and acting as a foreign agent.

But what, in layman’s terms, is he accused of doing?

In essence, the DOJ’s claim is this: before and after the 2016 election, Mr Barrack allegedly lobbied Mr Trump on behalf of another country, the United Arab Emirates, without ever telling the DOJ that he was doing so – as is required by law. Then, the DOJ says, when the FBI asked Mr Barrack about these activities, he lied to them.

None of this has been proven yet, and Mr Barrack denies any wrongdoing.

“Mr Barrack has made himself voluntarily available to investigators from the outset,” his spokesperson told CNN. “He is not guilty and will be pleading not guilty.”

The DOJ, however, has harshly criticized Mr Barrack and his alleged co-conspirators, Matthew Grimes and Rashid Sultan Rashid Al Malik Alshahhi, who were indicted as well.

“The conduct alleged in the indictment is nothing short of a betrayal of those officials in the United States, including the former President,” Acting Assistant Attorney General Mark Lesko said in a statement. “Through this indictment, we are putting everyone – regardless of their wealth or perceived political power – on notice that the Department of Justice will enforce the prohibition of this sort of undisclosed foreign influence.”

The DOJ’s narrative begins in April 2016, when it says Mr Barrack began acting as an “informal adviser” to Mr Trump’s presidential campaign. In November, after Mr Trump won the election, he became chairman of the Presidential Inaugural Committee. After the inauguration, the DOJ says, he “informally advised senior US government officials on issues related to US foreign policy in the Middle East.”

Throughout all this time, Mr Barrack “was regularly and repeatedly in contact with the senior leadership of the UAE government,” the Department says, either directly or through Mr Grimes or Mr Alshahhi.

Under US law, people acting on behalf of another government are required to register as foreign agents. According to the indictment, Mr Barrack never did so.

“Neither Alshahhi nor Barrack nor Grimes provided the required notification to the US Attorney General that they were acting in the United States as agents of a foreign government,” the DOJ says.

But the accusations don’t stop there. According to the indictment, FBI agents asked Mr Barrack about his work in June 2019, and Mr Barrack allegedly lied to them.

“During the interview, Barrack allegedly made numerous false statements, including falsely denying that Alshahhi had ever requested that he take any actions on behalf of the UAE,” the DOJ says.

Lying to federal investigators is a felony. The alleged falsehoods in this case led to two of the charges against Mr Barrack: obstruction of justice and making false statements to federal investigators.

William Sweeney Jr, assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Field Office, slammed Mr Barrack’s alleged conduct in a statement.

“This case is about secret attempts to influence our highest officials, and when that corrupt behavior was discovered, we allege Mr Barrack went even further, obstructing and lying to FBI special agents,” Mr Sweeney said. “In case it needs repeating, each of those bad choices is a federal felony, and each now comes with significant consequences – the first being today’s indictment.”

The Independent has reached out to Mr Barrack for comment though First Republic Bank, where he is a board member, but has not immediately heard back.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in