Trump's tax cut law barely boosted growth or wages and is not paying for itself, independent congressional report finds
‘Unbelievable’ claims by Republicans failed to come to pass, says Senate finance committee member
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump’s tax cut law – his signature achievement as president – has had little effect on GDP growth or wages and is failing to pay for itself, an independent congressional think tank has found.
Despite Mr Trump’s repeated claims the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would help workers by providing “rocket fuel” to the US economy, a report by the bipartisan Congressional Research Service showed the law was more beneficial to investors, who launched a wave of corporate buybacks.
The conclusions were largely in line with predictions by critics of the legislation and ran counter to claims by many Republicans, who said the tax cuts would ultimately pay for themselves and end up providing big increases in wages.
“In 2018, gross domestic product grew at 2.9 per cent, about the Congressional Budget Office’s projected rate published in 2017 before the tax cut. On the whole, the growth effects tend to show a relatively small (if any) first-year effect on the economy,” the report reads.
“Although growth rates cannot indicate the tax cut’s effects on GDP, they tend to rule out very large effects particularly in the short run.”
The authors, Jane Gravelle and Donald Maples, wrote in the report that although investment “grew significantly”, it did “not appear to be consistent with the direction and size” one would expect from the tax changes.
Wages, the report found, were not growing as quickly as the economy at large – 2 per cent in 2018 compared with 2.9 per cent GDP growth – with companies seeing a greater increase in earnings than employees, meaning that “ordinary workers had very little growth in wage rates”.
For workers paid by the hour, their real wages grew by just 1.2 per cent in 2018.
Despite the growing economy, the cuts only provided, at best, 5 per cent of the growth “needed to fully offset the revenue loss from the Act” – in other words, 95 per cent of the increased deficit was not offset by the additional growth.
The report said there had been “significant” share buybacks, “relatively little was directed to paying worker bonuses, which had been announced by some firms”.
Addressing the report’s findings, senator Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Committee on Finance, said: “Republicans made three unbelievable claims about their bill: it would pay for itself, raise wages by $4,000 (£3,200) and jump-start investment in the United States.”
He added: “In fact, the tax cuts are paying for just 5 per cent of their cost – not 100 per cent. Workers did not see a significant wage increase – the tax cuts largely paid for stock buybacks that push CEO compensation even higher. And the tax cuts have had a negligible effect on investment in the United States.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments