Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump sues to block subpoena for tax returns in Stormy Daniels probe

'The District Attorney issued a grand-jury subpoena he knew was overbroad and sought irrelevant records,' president's lawyers contend

John T. Bennett
Washington Bureau Chief
Tuesday 28 July 2020 15:20 BST
Comments
Trump says he won’t go and pay respects to John Lewis at Capitol

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump has refiled a lawsuit aimed at blocking Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance from obtaining his tax returns, with his lawyers saying the prosecutor's subpoena was issued in "bad faith".

The filing by the president's personal legal team comes a few weeks after the Supreme Court ruled Mr Vance could continue his pursuit of Mr Trump's financial records. Democratic lawmakers have tried to pry them loose for years, but the president claims he is under audit by the Internal Revenue Service, and therefore cannot make them public; the IRS has declined comment.

The high court rejected the Trump team's argument that Mr Vance could not be investigated by New York state officials while he occupies the Office of the President. But the justices said Mr Trump could challenge the subpoena on other grounds of his choosing.

"The District Attorney issued a grand-jury subpoena he knew was overbroad and sought irrelevant records," Mr Trump's lawyers wrote in their suit.

"That the District Attorney dubiously claims he did this for 'efficiency' reasons does not save the subpoena from invalidation," according to team Trump. "It confirms that he lacked a goodfaith basis and that the subpoena amounts to harassment of the President."

Mr Vance reportedly is looking into cash payments Mr Trump made paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels after an alleged sexual relationship she said was consensual.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in