US Intelligence chief refuses to say whether Trump asked him to push back against Russia investigation
The President reportedly asked Mr Coats to publicly deny the existence of evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russians
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Director of National Intelligence has told a Senate committee that he cannot publicly comment on whether Donald Trump asked him to push back against an investigation into possible collusion between Trump campaign advisers and Russia.
According to reports, Mr Trump asked Dan Coats and Michael Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, to publicly deny the existence of any evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with Russian operatives to influence the 2016 presidential election.
Coats and Rogers declined to comply with the President’s requests “which they both deemed to be inappropriate.”
During a hearing before the Senate Armed Forces committee, Republican Senator and committee chairman John McCain asked Mr Coats if the report - originally from The Washington Post - “was an accurate reporting?”
Mr Coats, who was appointed by Mr Trump, responded that it would be inappropriate for him to comment publicly on the topic.
“As the president’s principal intelligence adviser, I’m fortunate to be able to spend a significant amount of time with the President discussing national security interests and intelligence as it relates to those interests,” Mr Coats said.
“I have always believed that given the nature of my position and the information which we share, it’s not appropriate for me to comment publicly on any of that,” he added. “So on this topic as well as other topics, I don’t feel it’s appropriate to characterise the discussions and the conversations with the President.”
Mr Coats later said that the Russia probes – which are being conducted by a special prosecutor, as well as by committees in the Senate and House of Representatives – “are in place to get us to the right conclusion so we can move on”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments