Trump’s Mar-a-Lago co-defendants blocked from accessing classified documents they allegedly hid
Donald Trump-appointed judge Aileen Cannon will hold trial schedule hearing after resolving key evidence issues
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The federal judge presiding over Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago case has sided with special counsel Jack Smith to resolve a key issue surrounding his co-defendants’ access to the classified documents that they are accused of hiding.
US District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Mr Trump appointee, has rejected attempts from the former president’s co-defendants – longtime aide Walt Nauta and property employee Carlos De Oliveira – to view the classified records in question as they prepare for trial.
Mr Nauta and Mr De Oliveira sought to review the records to prepare their trial defences against obstruction charges for allegedly helping the former president unlawfully conceal documents after he left the White House.
The judge’s decision on Tuesday – which follows several closed-door hearings to review evidence to prepare for trial, including hearings that Mr Trump himself attended – comes days before a hearing to set a trial schedule for Mr Trump, who is preparing for three other criminal trials in three other jurisdictions, among a further mountain of litigation against him as he seeks the Republican nomination for president.
On Friday, the court will discuss scheduling and other issues in the case, which has been tentatively scheduled to begin in May.
In her order, Judge Cannon stated that the prosecutors with the special counsel “made a sufficient showing” in arguments that a review of classified documents from Mr Nauta and Mr De Oliveira would not be “relevant and helpful” to their defense, citing filings from Mr Smith’s office.
The men are charged with making false statements, conspiracy to obstruct justice and corruptly altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing documents, among other charges. They have pleaded not guilty.
Judge Cannon argued that there’s no reason they need to see the documents they are accused of moving.
She has not yet ruled on a similar request from the former president’s attorneys to review other classified material, which Mr Smith’s office has argued should be protected for national security reasons.
“Unlike the charges brought against Defendant Trump … the document-related charges against Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira do not require proof that they willfully retained documents ‘relating to the national defense,’” Judge Cannon wrote.
Mr Trump is similarly charged with a number of crimes, including willful retention of national defence information, conspiracy to obstruct justice, corruptly concealing a document, and concealing a document in a federal investigation, among others. He has also pleaded not guilty to all charges.
In a series of filings earlier this month, his attorneys argued that the charges should be dismissed on a number of grounds, including “presidential immunity” – a defence he has used and which judges have rejected in a separate federal case surrounding his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments