Mueller report: Barr defends Trump-Russia summary letter following backlash by investigators
Attorney general argues full report contains sensitive material which could not be released
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Attorney general William Barr is defending his handling of special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation, saying the confidential document contains sensitive grand jury material that prevented it from being immediately released to the public.
The statement on Thursday came as Mr Barr confronts concerns that his four-page letter summarising Mr Mueller's conclusions unduly sanitised the full report in President Donald Trump's favour, including on the key question of whether the president obstructed justice.
House Democrats on Wednesday approved subpoenas for Mr Mueller's entire report and any exhibits and other underlying evidence that the Justice Department might withhold.
The disparity in length between Mr Barr's letter and Mr Mueller's full report, which totals nearly 400 pages, raises the likelihood of additional significant information that was put forward by the special counsel's office but not immediately shared by the attorney general.
In Thursday's statement, Mr Barr defended the decision to release a brief summary letter two days after receiving the report on 22 March.
He has previously said he did not believe it would be in the public's interest to release the full document in piecemeal or gradual fashion, and that he did not intend for his letter summarising Mr Mueller's "principal conclusions" to be an "exhaustive recounting" of the special counsel's investigation.
Mr Barr is now expected to release the entire report, with redactions, by mid-April.
"Given the extraordinary public interest in the matter, the attorney general decided to release the report's bottom-line findings and his conclusions immediately — without attempting to summarise the report — with the understanding that the report itself would be released after the redaction process," the Justice Department statement said.
The statement also said that every page of Mr Mueller's report was marked that it may contain grand jury material "and therefore could not immediately be released."
A Justice Department official, speaking on Thursday on condition of anonymity to discuss a confidential process, said summaries of the findings that Mr Mueller's team included as part of its report also contained grand jury information, making it hard for a swift release.
Mr Barr has said that while Mr Mueller did not establish a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign, the special counsel left open a decision on whether the president had tried to obstruct the Russia investigation.
The Mueller team laid out evidence on both sides of the question in a way that neither established a crime nor exonerated Mr Trump, according to Mr Barr's letter.
Mr Barr has said he and deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein determined that Mr Mueller's evidence was insufficient to support an obstruction allegation.
Mr Barr said he was continuing to work with Mr Mueller's office on redactions to the report so that it could be released to Congress and the public.
Associated Press
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments