Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

‘It could have been a John Kelly’: Trump says former chief of staff may have been source for Atlantic story and claims he ‘couldn’t handle’ White House pressure

“He was unable to handle the pressure of this job,” the president says about John Kelly

Danielle Zoellner
New York
Friday 04 September 2020 23:21 BST
Comments
Trump says Kelly may have been source for Atlantic article
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump has said his former chief of staff, John Kelly, could have been one of the four anonymous sources used by The Atlantic in the publication’s report that the president made disparaging comments about military troops.

“It could have been a guy like a John Kelly,” Mr Trump said while calling the story a “hoax”.

The president’s response about his former chief of staff came after he was asked why General Kelly has not denied or confirmed the report in The Atlantic.

“I know John Kelly. He was with me. He had no temperament,” Mr Trump said. He went on to say that Mr Kelly was “exhausted” and “unable to function” by the end of his time with the Trump administration.

“He was unable to handle the pressure of this job,” the president added. Mr Kelly served as Mr Trump’s chief of staff from July 2017 to January 2019.

Mr Trump has vehemently denied the report that released this week stating that he objected to visiting the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because he did not see the point in honouring the soldiers who died.

“Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers,” Mr Trump allegedly said. It was reported at the time that the trip was cancelled because his helicopter couldn’t fly in the rain that day and Secret Service was unable to take him to the cemetery.

The White House has denied the reports by releasing a 2018 email stating the weather conditions were too poor that day to fly.

Another incident from the same trip involved Mr Trump allegedly calling the Marines who died at Belleau Wood, one of the toughest battles for the Marines during the First World War, “suckers”.

Other allegations in The Atlantic’s report included Mr Trump questioning a young Marine’s sacrifice during a 2017 Memorial Day visit to Arlington Cemetery with General Kelly, citing multiple sources. The man in question was Mr Kelly’s son 1st Lieutenant Robert Kelly who was killed in Afghanistan in 2010.

Mr Trump and General Kelly, who was serving as the president’s secretary of homeland security at the time, stopped at the son’s grave when visiting the cemetery. Mr Trump reportedly turned to General Kelly and said: ”I don’t get it. What was in it for them?”

In an effort to deny the reports, multiple former and current member of the Trump administration have said those instances never happened, adding that the president honours everyone who served in the military.

White House deputy press secretary Judd Deere slammed The Atlantic for using four anonymous sources in the report.

“Not a soul brave enough to put their name on any of these accusations,” he tweeted in response. “That’s because they are false. Just another anonymously sourced story meant to tear down a Commander-in-Chief who loves our military and has delivered on the promises he’s made. What a disgrace!”

Reporters from the Washington Post, the Associated Press, and Fox News have independently confirmed The Atlantic’s story.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in