Trump impeachment witness told to issue a public statement of loyalty to president on camera
‘Smear campaign’ on respected diplomat was allegedly led by president’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani weeks before Marie Yanovitch was recalled from Ukraine
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Before she was fired, the former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, was advised by the US State Department to issue a public statement of loyalty to President Donald Trump, possibly on camera, the impeachment inquiry has heard.
Giving evidence to the Intelligence Committee in Washington DC on Monday, the under secretary of state for political affairs, David Hale, described how in March 2019, Ms Yovanovitch came under fire during a “smear campaign” allegedly led by Mr Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani – who apparently wanted her removed from office.
The so-called smear campaign, four months before the 25 July phone call between Mr Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky at the centre of the impeachment scandal, focused on an allegation the Ukrainian prosecutor general Yuriy Lutsenko said Ms Yovanovitch had given him a “do not prosecute list,” though Mr Lutsenko later retracted that claim.
According to Mr Hale, during the smear campaign, Ms Yovanovitch felt “the tempo of the social media and other criticisms of her were such that she felt she could no longer function” in her role.
So amid this apparent deterioration in the relationship between the White House and the diplomatic team in Ukraine, Mr Hale suggested the State Department wrote “a very robust 10 full-page statement of defence and praise ... for the ambassador’s work,” he told the inquiry.
“And the concept was that simultaneously, or in coordination anyway, she would put out a statement. And they were debating in her embassy whether she should do it on camera or a written statement.”
Explaining the rationale behind the plan, Mr Hale said: “I thought it was a good idea for her to demonstrate that she – there was – because it had become so personal, that she needed to remind people what foreign services are and who we were loyal to, and who we work for and that she was committed to that, and that that would be backed up, of course, by the statement that she was also seeking from the State Department.”
Ultimately, no written statement by the State Department in support of Ms Yovanovitch was drawn up, and she did not issue a public statement of loyalty to Mr Trump.
Mr Hale said his team came to recognise “it would only fuel further negative reaction. And our plan at that point was to try to contain this and wait it out.”
He added: “A statement of endorsement for the ambassador might lead these various individuals, whoever they were, who were conveying information that was derogatory about the ambassador, to counter it, and so it would just further fuel the story and there would be more back and forth.
“So I think the judgment was that it would be better for everyone, including the ambassador, to try to just move past this.”
On 6 May Ms Yovanovitch was recalled from Ukraine.
Mr Hale also described how he found the entire situation “puzzling”, particularly regarding why Mr Giuliani would pursue allegations against Ms Yovanovitch, when if Mr Trump wanted her removed from office, he could simply appoint a different ambassador to Ukraine.
“I found it very hard to understand why a president of the United States would do it that way when he can just – I mean, all ambassadors are presidential appointees, they serve at the pleasure of the President, so it didn’t – it didn’t add up to me,” he told the Intelligence Committee.
Mr Hale said he eventually understood Mr Giuliani was playing a significant role in the campaign to remove Ms Yovanovitch, which subsequently resulted in her departure from her role.
During the 25 July phone call with the Ukrainian president – which has become the basis for the impeachment inquiry due to the allegation Mr Trump asked Ukraine to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son’s role at a company in Ukraine – Mr Trump referred to Ms Yovanovitch as “the woman” and as “bad news”, warning: “Well, she’s going to go through some things.”
Earlier this month it was reported Ms Yovanovitch had also been advised to tweet in support of Mr Trump amid the smear campaign against her.
Speaking at the impeachment hearings at the beginning of November, Ms Yovanovitch said after clashing with Mr Giuliani, she was told by Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, and one of the Trump allies working with Mr Giuliani to tweet praise of the president help her keep her job.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments