Trump's 'interference in CNN merger' an impeachable offence, says husband of White House adviser
President's alleged 'retribution' is 'unquestionably' unconstitutional, George Conway insists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump’s alleged interference in a business merger involving CNN is “unquestionably” an impeachable offence, a lawyer and husband to one of the US president’s senior advisers has said.
The New Yorker reported that Mr Trump in 2017 told Gary Cohn, his then chief economic adviser, and John Kelly, his former chief of staff, to pressure the Department of Justice to block AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner, which owned CNN.
Mr Trump publicly objected to the merger, with many claiming it was to spite a news channel he perceives as an enemy.
According to an unnamed source cited in the publication, the president told Mr Kelly at the time: "I’ve been telling Cohn to get this lawsuit filed and nothing’s happened! I’ve mentioned it 50 times. And nothing’s happened. I want to make sure it’s filed. I want that deal blocked!”
George Conway, a frequent Trump critic who is married to White House counsel Kellyanne Conway, tweeted: “If proven, such an attempt to use presidential authority to seek retribution for the exercise of first amendment rights would unquestionably be grounds for impeachment.”
The Justice Department went to court in late 2017 in a bid to stop the $85bn acquisition. However, following a six-week trial a US judge ruled it could go ahead. Last week an appeals court rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to overturn the ruling.
Mr Conway’s impeachment comments were echoed by Democratic congressman Dan Kildee, who on Monday said alleged hush money paid by Mr Trump to women who claimed they had an affair with him could be enough to take steps towards impeachment.
"I don't think it has to be Russia-related collusion in order for us to take a step," he told MSNBC.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments