Trump’s hush money judge rejects his third attempt to kick him off the case
Trump accused Judge Juan Merchan of conflict of interest over his daughter’s political consulting work
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s criminal hush money trial won’t be stepping away after the former president failed to kick him off the case for a third time.
Trump has repeatedly tried and failed to force New York Justice Juan Merchan to recuse himself.
In a late filing on Tuesday, Judge Merchan shot down a third recusal motion from Trump, who has alleged that there is a conflict of interest because Merchan’s daughter works as a Democratic political consultant.
Trump’s attorneys accused Merchan’s daughter of having a “long-standing relationship” with Kamala Harris, and claimed that she “has obtained — and stands to obtain in the future — extensive financial, professional, and personal benefits from her relationship with Harris.”
Last year, New York’s Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics determined that Merchan’s impartiality “cannot reasonably be questioned” based on his daughter’s line of work.
“This Court now reiterates for the third time that which should already be clear,” Merchan wrote. “Innuendo and mischaracterizations do not a conflict create. Recusal is therefore not necessary, much less required.”
![New York Justice Juan Merchan denied Donald Trump’s third attempt to kick him off the hush money case.](https://static.independent.co.uk/2024/08/14/14/b48bc951ae4540eda63dcfbcda74fc86.jpg)
Trump has “provided nothing new for this Court to consider,” according to Merchan.
His attorneys have “merely repeated arguments that have already been denied by this and higher courts,” the judge added. “Defense Counsel’s reliance, and apparent citation to his own prior affirmation, rife with inaccuracies and unsubstantiated claims, is unavailing.”
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg blasted Trump’s latest recusal motion in court filings as a “vexatious and frivolous attempt to relitigate” an issue that the court had already decided twice before.
“No amount of overheated, hyperbolic rhetoric can cure the fatal defects in [Trump’s] ongoing effort to impugn the fairness of these proceedings and the impartiality of this Court,” the filing from Bragg’s office read.
On May 30, a jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records as part of a scheme to corruptly influence the 2016 election by covering up reimbursement payments to Michael Cohen. The attorney had bought the silence of adult film star Stormy Daniels to prevent her from going public with her story about having sex with Trump.
After the Supreme Court ruled that presidents have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official actions in office earlier this year, Trump’s attorneys argued that the New York verdict should be tossed, claiming that evidence presented should have been shielded from jurors.
Judge Merchan is expected to issue a decision on that motion by September 16. Trump is scheduled to be sentenced on September 18.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.