Trump loses another attempt to throw out hush money trial gag order

Threats to prosecutors and court staff have ‘continued to pose a significant and imminent threat,’ appeals court rules

Alex Woodward
in New York
Thursday 01 August 2024 17:52 BST
Related: Kamala Harris targets Trump as she unveils campaign focus

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

Donald Trump has lost yet another attempt to throw out a gag order in his hush money case in New York.

A panel of appeals court judges on Thursday rejected the former president’s argument that the gag order should be entirely lifted after his conviction. The five judges on the midlevel state appeals court sided with New York Justice Juan Merchan, who extended protections for prosecutors and court staff through Trump’s sentencing.

A gag order intended to stop Trump’s public attacks — which have fueled threats and harassment aimed at trial witnesses, judges and prosecutors — should partially remain in place to allow Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and court staff “to perform their lawful duties free from threats, intimidation, harassment, and harm” until sentencing, the judges wrote.

The district attorney’s office successfully argued that harassing messages have “continued to pose a significant and imminent threat” even after the jury’s 34-count guilty verdict in May, according to the appeals court judges.

“We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing,” they wrote.

The former president is scheduled to be sentencing on September 18, after his attorneys pressed for delays to make their case that the verdict should be thrown out under the terms of a landmark Supreme Court ruling that grants the president “immunity” from criminal prosecution for “official” actions performed in office.

Manhattan prosecutors have urged Judge Merchan to reject that argument.

Donald Trump and his attorney Todd Blanche appear in a criminal courthouse in Manhattan on May 30. He has repeatedly failed to completely overturn a gag order restricting his public attacks against prosecutors, court staff, witnesses and jurors.
Donald Trump and his attorney Todd Blanche appear in a criminal courthouse in Manhattan on May 30. He has repeatedly failed to completely overturn a gag order restricting his public attacks against prosecutors, court staff, witnesses and jurors. (AP)

Trump has repeatedly used his Truth Social account to rage against witnesses, judges and prosecutors, which have fueled harassing and threatening messages aimed at attorneys, court staff and their families, according to law enforcement filings in several cases against him.

New York City Police Department investigators logged dozens of “actionable threats” against the district attorney, his family and staff since Trump was indicted, including 56 that were made in April, May and June of this year, according to court filings.

On May 30, a jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records connected with an election interference scheme that involved buying the silence of adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Last month, with the verdict rendered and the jury discharged, and without opposition from Manhattan prosecutors, Judge Merchan agreed to lift a portion of the gag order intended to protect trial witnesses like Daniels and Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen.

The judge also agreed to lift protections for jurors, though he said it is his “strong preference” to keep them in place.

During the hush money trial, Trump was fined $10,000 for 10 statements violating the gag order, and Judge Merchan threatened him with jail if he continued to violate the terms of the order.

“The magnitude of such a decision is not lost on me,” Merchan told Trump from inside the courtroom in May.

“But at the end of the day I have a job to do, and part of that job is to protect the dignity of the justice system,” he said. “Your continued violations … threaten to interfere with the administration of justice, and constitute a direct attack on the rule of law.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in