Donald Trump sparks disarray after attacking surveillance powers his administration is supposed to support
Act is reauthorised – but without surveillance limits lawmakers had sought
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Congress rejected new limits on surveillance that sweeps in Americans after Donald Trump roiled debate with a series of contradictory tweets assailing a programme his administration is on the record supporting.
A provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows intelligence agencies to gather communications from foreign targets without obtaining warrants, has spurred a debate over the balance between national security and privacy. With the broader programme up for renewal, a bipartisan group of politicians proposed requiring warrants when surveillance vacuums up messages Americans send or are mentioned in.
An amendment imposing that mandate failed in a House vote as representatives approved the larger programme with minimal changes. On the eve of the vote, the White House sent out a statement saying it “strongly opposes” the proposed surveillance limits.
“This amendment would re-establish the walls between intelligence and law enforcement that our country knocked down following the attacks of 9/11 in order to increase information sharing and improve our national security,” the statement said.
The White House had thrown its support behind the surveillance provision on similar grounds, with multiple administration officials calling for it to be made permanent, but Mr Trump sowed confusion by attacking the measure and then seeming to backtrack.
After initially decrying the programme on Twitter as having been used to “so badly surveil and abuse the Trump Campaign,” he later said that “today’s vote is about foreign surveillance of foreign bad guys on foreign land”.
“We need it! Get smart”! Mr Trump said.
Those divergent responses prompted some members of Congress to question whether Mr Trump understood a controversial national security tool that was on the verge of being renewed.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, suggested that the House should hold off on voting until representatives had more clarity on Mr Trump's tweets.
“FISA is something the President should have known about long before he turned on Fox this morning,” Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the senior Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said on Twitter.
According to CNN, Mr Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan, who leads the Republican caucus, spoke after the President’s initial tweet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments