Trump asked aides 'can we just get rid of the judges?', book claims
‘There shouldn’t be any judges at all, really,’ president complains after court defeats
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump suggested “getting rid” of federal judges after the courts repeatedly ruled against his controversial policies, according to a senior administration official.
The US president even asked lawyers to draft a bill reducing the number of judges during one of his rants in the White House, it is claimed.
“Can we just get rid of the judges?”, the president asked aides, according to the anonymous author of A Warning. “Let’s get rid of the [expletive] judges... There shouldn’t be any at all, really.”
Mr Trump has suffered several reversals in the courts since he became president – most notably in relation to his 2017 ban on travel from seven Muslim countries including Iran, Somalia and Yemen.
After the executive order was blocked by Washington district judge James Robart, Mr Trump accused him of putting the country in peril and added:”If something happens blame him and court system.” An amended version of the ban was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court in June 2018.
In November 2018 Mr Trump renewed his attacks on the judiciary after district judge Jon Tigar halted the Trump administration’s attempts to prevent migrants from applying for asylum.
Despite being rebuked by Supreme Court chief justice John Roberts for describing judge Tigar as an “Obama judge”, the president went on to claim that 9th US Circuit Court of Appeal was “a complete and total disaster” and “out of control”.
More recently a federal court judge ruled Mr Trump’s declaration of a national emergency over the country’s southern border was unlawful. And this week an appeals court ordered the president to hand over his tax returns to prosecutors.
However, rather than getting rid of federal judges, Mr Trump appears to have decided to simply appoint more judges in an attempt to “tip the balance” of the courts.
The president has already nominated two Supreme Court justices, 44 Circuit Court judges, and 112 District Court judges, according to the White House.
In a statement hailing what it calls a “historic transformation of the judiciary”, the Trump administration complained that “activist judges have repeatedly used nationwide injunctions to block the policies of the democratically-elected president.”
One federal judge claimed on Wednesday that Mr Trump’s repeated attacks on the judiciary were undermining public faith in the rule of law.
During a lecture in Washington, district judge Paul Friedman said:“We are witnessing a chief executive who criticises virtually every judicial decision that doesn’t go his way and denigrates judges who rule against him, sometimes in very personal terms.”
He added: “We are in uncharted territory.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments