Trump tells court he has ‘absolute immunity’ over January 6
Attorney for former president calls for Democrat’s lawsuit to be ‘firmly rejected’ over right to ‘absolute immunity’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump told a court he has “absolute immunity” in a case brought against him by a Democratic congressman for inciting the January insurrection on the US Capitol.
An attorney for the former president argued that allegations against Mr Trump were in contravention of the absolute immunity conveyed on US presidents, and that the 74-year-old’s words were taken out of context.
Eric Swalwell, the Democrat who is bringing the case against Mr Trump, accuses the former president of inciting the 6 January attack on the country’s legislature.
According to Mr Trump’s attorney, “the president’s absolute immunity forecloses the jurisdiction of this court”.
"In bringing this suit, the Congressman asks this Court to wade into turbulent political waters to decide what controversial speech should be favoured,” the attorney wrote. “The Court should firmly reject that invitation”.
It continued: “The claims against former President Trump directly contravene the absolute immunity conveyed on the President by the Constitution as a key principle of separation of powers”.
Jesse Binnall, the attorney for Mr Trump, added that Rep Swalwell’s case was in contravention of the First amendment right to free speech, and asked the court dismiss it.
The Democrat wrote in an initial court filing in March, that “the horrific events of January 6 were a direct and foreseeable consequence of the Defendants’ unlawful actions” and “as such, the Defendants are responsible for the injury and destruction that followed.”
Mr Trump told crowds at a rally before the insurrection to “march” on the Capitol with “strength”, to demonstrate against the confirmation of Joe Biden’s election win.
The court filing for the former president was filed with the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Monday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments