Donald Trump claims Dreamer immigrants have been 'abandoned' by Democrats, despite having axed DACA scheme himself
'Republicans are still working hard', the President says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President Donald Trump has claimed young undocumented immigrants – so-called dreamers – have been abandoned by Democrats, even though he himself rescinded the programme granting them protection from deportation.
“Cannot believe how BADLY DACA recipients have been treated by the Democrats...totally abandoned! Republicans are still working hard,” the President tweeted.
Both Republicans and Democrats on Thursday rebuked Mr Trump’s “four pillar” plan to resolve the fate of dreamers, reshape the US immigration system and fund his border wall. Only 39 senators in the 100-member Senate voted in favour of Mr Trump’s proposal.
But senators also turned away two other bipartisan proposals, ultimately leaving Congress with no clear path to protect dreamers.
"The next step," White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement, "will be for the House to continue advancing the proposal from Chairman Goodlatte and Chairman McCaul." But it is unlikely that plan would be approved in the House or make it out of the Senate.
The rejection of Mr Trump’s plan – reflected in a measure introduced by Republican Senator Chuck Grassley – would have bolstered border security, restricted family-based immigration and ended a visa lottery. It would also have provided $25bn for the border wall and offered a chance of citizenship for up to 1.8m dreamers.
Mr Trump essentially forced Congress to address US immigration policy, a big talking point during his presidential campaign, when he rescinded the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals programme in September. The Obama-era policy lets young immigrants who were brought to the US illegally as minors, the dreamers, live and work in the US without fear of deportation.
About 700,000 undocumented immigrants are currently protected under the programme. An additional 1.1m dreamers were eligible for the program, but they did not apply.
Mr Trump had given Congress until March 5 to come up with a legislative fix, but US courts have ordered the Trump administration to extend DACA, making the president's deadline less firm, according to the Washington Post.
Senators have scrambled over the past week to come up with bipartisan proposals that could have a chance of clearing the chamber. Each plan needed at least 60 votes to advance.
But leading up to the votes on Thursday, the White House worked to torpedo several plans.
“The Schumer-Rounds-Collins immigration bill would be a total catastrophe,” Mr Trump wrote on Twitter. The deal, crafted by a group of centrist lawmakers, would have protected dreamers in exchange for roughly $25bn for border security.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer on the Senate floor said the President, “since he created the problem by terminating DACA last August, has stood in the way of every single proposal that has had a chance of becoming law.”
He had urged his colleagues to vote for the bipartisan package, acknowledging that both parties would find things they support and oppose in the bill.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments