Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump ‘pursued multiple criminal means to overturn election’ new special counsel filing claims

Jack Smith’s latest filing outlines Trump’s ‘series of increasingly desperate plans’ to cling to power in 2020

Alex Woodward
Wednesday 02 October 2024 22:32
Comments
JD Vance refuses to say that Trump lost the 2020 election

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

Special counsel Jack Smith has outlined a sprawling criminal case against Donald Trump for his attempts to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential election, detailing for the first time the former president’s “increasingly desperate efforts” to cling to power with “knowingly false claims of election fraud.”

Trump intentionally lied to voters, election officials, and his own vice president Mike Pence in what amounted to a criminal effort to stay in office, culminating in his failure to stop a mob that tried to do it with violence, according to the document filed in federal court in Washington DC on Wednesday.

“When the defendant lost the 2020 presidential election, he resorted to crimes to try to stay in office,” the filing says. “With private co-conspirators, the defendant launched a series of increasingly desperate plans to overturn the legitimate election results in seven states that he had lost.”

The 165-page filing — the fullest picture yet of Smith’s case — follows his renewed attempt to prosecute Trump in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision that granted him some immunity from criminal prosecution for his spurious efforts to reverse his loss.

That new superseding indictment retains the same four core criminal charges against him, as Smith navigates a Supreme Court ruling that a president is “absolutely” immune from criminal prosecution for actions that stem from official duties in office, and retains “presumptive” immunity for actions in the “outer perimeter” of those duties.

Smith notes in the latest document that those co-conspirators acted in their “private” roles, not as public servants.

In that capacity, Trump — “working with a team of private co-conspirators — had “acted as a candidate when he pursued multiple criminal means to disrupt, through fraud and deceit, the government function by which votes are collected and counted,” according to prosecutors.

Trump was acting as a candidate for office, not an office holder, when he committed the crimes at the center of the case, according to Smith.

The former president “must stand trial for his private crimes as would any other citizen,” Smith adds.

“Although the defendant was the incumbent President during the charged conspiracies, his scheme was fundamentally a private one,” according to Smith.

Special Counsel Jack Smith, pictured speakingto reporters in 2023, released a mammoth 165-page court filing on October 2 that outlines his team’s case against Donald Trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election.
Special Counsel Jack Smith, pictured speakingto reporters in 2023, released a mammoth 165-page court filing on October 2 that outlines his team’s case against Donald Trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. (REUTERS)

The lengthy filing traces the history of Trump’s false claims of election fraud, characterized as an attempt to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election, despite knowing that they were false.

The filing then documents the state-by-state efforts from Trump and his unindicted co-conspirators and allies to pressure state officials, election workers and others to validate his scheme to reverse his loss, then organize allies to submit fraudulent election certificates falsely stating that he won.

“The throughline of these efforts was deceit: the defendant’s and co-conspirators’ knowingly false claims of election fraud,” according to Smith’s team.

The filing lists multiple instances in which Trump’s own advisers disproved his claims, to which Trump allegedly replied: “It doesn’t matter if you won or lost the election. You still have to fight like hell.”

Pence repeatedly told Trump that there was no evidence of fraud to alter the election’s outcome, which Trump ignored, according to prosecutors.

Prosecutors intend to introduce at trial evidence of Trump’s “deliberate disregard for the truth” and show that Trump and his allies “made up figures from whole cloth.”

The document also outlines one incident in which a Trump campaign employee tried to “sow confusion” and start a “riot” at a vote-counting center in Detroit.

Prosecutors also intend to introduce trial testimony from a witness who claims that Trump told his family that he would “fight to remain in power regardless of whether he won the election,” according to the filing.

Trump is charged with four crimes, including conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights. He has pleaded not guilty.

In court filings, his lawyers opposed the release of Wednesday’s filing, which they called “tantamount to a premature and improper” report from the special counsel, and argued that its public release amounts to election interference.

District Judge Tanya Chutkan — who has been eager to move the case forward after it was effectively frozen for months as the “immunity” appeal reached the Supreme Court — ordered that the document be publicly released. She has repeatedly refuted claims that the case against the Republican nominee for president is interfering in the 2024 election.

On his Truth Social, Trump blasted the filing as “falsehood-ridden” and “unconstitutional” and suggested that it was in response to Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz’s “disastrous” debate performance on Tuesday night.

This is a developing story

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in