Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge blocks Jack Smith’s request for gag order against Donald Trump in classified documents case

Jack Smith requested a gag order against Mr Trump to limit his comments about officers who searched Mar-a-Lago

Katie Hawkinson
Tuesday 28 May 2024 17:25 BST
Comments
Donald Trump walks into his hush money trial on 28 May. The federal judge in his classified documents case denied a request by Special Counsel Jack Smith to place a gag order on the former president
Donald Trump walks into his hush money trial on 28 May. The federal judge in his classified documents case denied a request by Special Counsel Jack Smith to place a gag order on the former president (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A judge blocked Special Counsel Jack Smith’s request to bar Donald Trump from making statements that could pose a threat to law enforcement in his classified documents case.

Federal Judge Aileen Cannon wrote that Mr Smith’s motion was “wholly lacking in substance and professional courtesy,” as it didn’t give Trump’s defense team enough time to respond. Mr Smith made the request on Friday, asking the judge to limit the comments Mr Trump could make about the law enforcement officers who searched his Mar-a-Lago resort.

Last week, Trump trotted out an outrageous claim that FBI aents were “authorized to shoot me” while searching Mar-a-Lago.

The former president’s defense team had decried Mr Smith’s now-denied motion, arguing it was an “extraordinary, unprecedented, and unconstitutional censorship application.”

On Monday, defense attorney Chris Kise asked Judge Cannon to hold “all government attorneys who participated in the decision to file the motion” in civil contempt and impose sanctions after an evidentiary hearing.

The former president faces allegations that he illegally retained national defense information, that he took part in a conspiracy to obstruct justice and that he made false statements.

Donald Trump walks into his hush money trial on 28 May. The federal judge in his classified documents case denied a request by Special Counsel Jack Smith to place a gag order on the former president
Donald Trump walks into his hush money trial on 28 May. The federal judge in his classified documents case denied a request by Special Counsel Jack Smith to place a gag order on the former president (Getty Images)

Prosecutors allege that he kept secret files in unsecured parts of his Mar-a-Lago home and worked to obstruct authorities trying to get them back. The files included secret documents from the Pentagon, the National Security Agency and the CIA.

Mr Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The trial was initially scheduled to begin this month. However, Judge Cannon indefinitely postponed the trial on 7 May, noting the original date didn’t work because of the number of remaining pre-trial motions.

A hearing in the case last week devolved into a shouting match as each side fought over claims of an alleged threat against a defense attorney.

Meanwhile, the former president’s hush money trial in New York City is coming to an end this week. The jury could begin deliberations as soon as Wednesday to determine if they will convict Mr Trump on charges of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 payment made to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels in October 2016.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in