Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump asylum ban is ‘illegal,’ major civil rights group warns

Human rights groups and the United Nations all say the plans will cause harm

Chris Riotta
New York
Friday 09 November 2018 19:37 GMT
Comments
Donald Trump: immigrants to 'present themselves legally' at border or void asylum claim

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump's proposal to ban asylum for certain undocumented immigrants has been attacked as "illegal" by human rights groups who say that asylum is a "lifeline" for those fleeing danger.

Under the new measures from the White House, undocumented immigrants arriving at the nation’s borders between ports of entry would no longer be able to legally apply for asylum. The move relies on emergency powers the president had previously invoked through the implementation of his “travel ban” involving people from several Muslim-majority nations last year.

Mr Trump's proclamation will effectively suspend the granting of asylum to migrants who cross the US border with Mexico illegally for up to 90 days, beginning on Saturday.

In a statement shortly after news broke of the policy shift, one of America's biggest civil rights groups, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said: “US law specifically allows individuals to apply for asylum whether or not they are at a port of entry.”

The group added, “It is illegal to circumvent that — by agency or presidential decree.”

By Friday afternoon, the ACLU had filed a lawsuit against the directive, likely paving the way for an exhaustive legal battle.

Mr Trump has railed against undocumented immigration along the US-Mexico border since the start of his presidential campaign - but it has intensified in recent weeks with a number of caravans containing thousands of refugees and migrants slowly heading to the border. many of those travelling in the caravans are fleeing violence in Central American nations including Honduras and El Salvador.

The president recently proposed a slate of hardline policies to deal with the issue, including revoking the nation’s amendment-protected practice of providing birthright citizenship. The president has also called for housing immigrants in “tent cities”

On Friday, the president told reporters he had signed the directive to revamp the asylum process, effectively barring undocumented immigrants who cross the border illegally from applying for asylum.

Current law provides a year for migrants who have illegally crossed the border to apply for asylum, however, under the new orders migrants are required to go directly to a port of entry along the border in order to apply.

The UN refugee agency, UNHCR, said on Friday that everyone fleeing violence or persecution should get protection "without obstruction".

Many of the people on the move in Central America and Mexico today are fleeing “life-threatening violence or persecution” and require international protection, the UNHCR said in a statement issued in Geneva.

“UNHCR expects all countries, including the United States, to make sure any person in need of refugee protection and humanitarian assistance is able to receive both promptly and without obstruction in accordance with the 1967 refugee Protocol to which the United States is a party,” the agency said, referring to a protocol to the 1951 Refugee Convention.

It added that “long-standing insufficient reception capacity at official U.S. southern border ports of entry” was causing significant delays in northern Mexico, forcing many desperate asylum-seekers to turn to smugglers and cross the border irregularly.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

“National security and dignified reception of refugees and asylum-seekers are not mutually exclusive, but rather mutually reinforcing,” it said.

Human rights group Amnesty International also rejected the new measures and claimed it “needlessly places the lives of thousands of people in danger.”

“Asylum is not a loophole, it is a lifeline,” Secretary General Kumi Naidoo said.

The White House has defended the new measures, claiming the policy will make it safer for migrants who attempt to cross the geographically arduous border.

“Today, we are using the authority granted to us by Congress to bar aliens who violate a Presidential suspension of entry or other restriction from asylum eligibility,” Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said in a joint statement Thursday.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in