Texas officials launch legal challenge against Trump's 'racist' border wall
Lawsuit says Mexican-Americans were being made ‘second class United States citizens’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Authorities and landowners in South Texas have described Donald Trump’s border as an attack on Mexican-Americans in a lawsuit.
Two landowners and authorities in Zappa County, which sits on the Texas-Mexico border, submitted the lawsuit in Laredo on Monday.
The case argues against the wall’s construction on the basis that constitutional protections afforded to Mexican-Americans were under attack.
“The action of the government is based on animus toward a group, and that’s unconstitutional,” attorney Carlos Flores told The Texas Tribune. “You can’t make policy in governmental action based on animus toward a group”.
The case states that “second class United States citizen[s]” would be produced at the southern border due to president Trump’s executive order on the border wall.
Executive Order Number 13767 had also seen US citizens’ “land seized wholesale based on racist and white nationalist motives”, said the lawsuit.
That, said Mr Flores, violated the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause, which provides for equal protection under the law.
It states that “No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”.
Mr Flores told The Tribune that the Trump administration went ahead with border wall construction to boost his 2020 re-election bid, having made promises in 2016 that he would build the wall.
“This is something that hasn’t really been brought up before” added Mr Flores, who submitted the Zapata County lawsuit.
Two others, Laredoan Melissa Cigarroa and George C. Rincon, were also named on the lawsuit, said The Tribune.
The legal challenge is the latest border wall complaint against the Trump administration, who was blocked last month from using military funding to pay for the border wall’s construction.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments