Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

AP WAS THERE: Supreme Court gives same-sex marriage rights

On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples had the right to marry

Mark Sherman
Thursday 08 December 2022 16:56 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Editor's Note: On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples had the right to marry. The narrow, 5-4, decision did away with same-sex marriage bans in 14 states.

With the passage of the the Respect for Marriage Act, which protects same-sex and interracial marriages, The Associated Press is republishing its 2015 story by reporter Mark Sherman on on the Supreme Courtā€™s same-sex ruling.

____

Same-sex couples won the right to marry nationwide Friday as a divided Supreme Court handed a crowning victory to the gay rights movement, setting off a jubilant cascade of long-delayed weddings in states where they had been forbidden.

ā€œNo longer may this liberty be denied,ā€ said Justice Anthony Kennedy.

The vote was narrow - 5-4 - but Kennedyā€™s majority opinion was clear and firm: ā€œThe court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry.ā€

The ruling will put an end to same-sex marriage bans in the 14 states that still maintain them, and provide an exclamation point for breathtaking changes in the nationā€™s social norms in recent years. As recently as last October, just over one-third of the states permitted gay marriages.

Kennedyā€™s reading of the ruling elicited tears in the courtroom, euphoria outside and the immediate issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples in at least eight states. In Dallas, Kenneth Denson said he and Gabriel Mendez had been legally married in 2013 in California but ā€œweā€™re Texans; we want to get married in Texas.ā€

In praise of the decision, President Barack Obama called it ā€œjustice that arrives like a thunderbolt.ā€

Four of the courtā€™s justices werenā€™t cheering. The dissenters accused their colleagues of usurping power that belongs to the states and to voters, and short-circuiting a national debate about same-sex marriage.

ā€œThis court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us,ā€ Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in dissent. Roberts read a summary of his dissent from the bench, the first time he has done so in nearly 10 years as chief justice.

ā€œIf you are among the many Americans - of whatever sexual orientation - who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate todayā€™s decision,ā€ Roberts said. ā€œBut do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.ā€

Justice Antonin Scalia said he was not concerned so much about same-sex marriage as ā€œthis courtā€™s threat to American democracy.ā€ He termed the decision a ā€œjudicial putsch.ā€ Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas also dissented.

Several religious organizations criticized the decision.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said it was ā€œprofoundly immoral and unjust for the government to declare that two people of the same sex can constitute a marriage.ā€

Kennedy said nothing in the courtā€™s ruling would force religions to condone, much less perform, weddings to which they object. And he said the couples seeking the right to marry should not have to wait for the political branches of government to act.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution requires states to allow same-sex couples to marry on the same basis as heterosexuals, he said

ā€œThe dynamic of our constitutional system is that individuals need not await legislative action before asserting a fundamental right. The nationā€™s courts are open to injured individuals who come to them to vindicate their own

direct, personal stake in our basic charter,ā€ Kennedy wrote in his fourth major opinion in support of gay rights since 1996. It came on the anniversary of two of those earlier decisions.

ā€œNo union is more profound than marriage,ā€ Kennedy wrote, joined by the courtā€™s four more liberal justices.

The stories of the people asking for the right to marry ā€œreveal that they seek not to denigrate marriage but rather to live their lives, or honor their spousesā€™ memory, joined by its bond,ā€ Kennedy said.

As he read his opinion, spectators in the courtroom wiped away tears when the import of the decision became clear. One of those in the audience was James Obergefell, the lead plaintiff in the Supreme Court fight.

Outside, Obergefell held up a photo of his late spouse, John Arthur, and said the ruling establishes that ā€œour love is equal.ā€ He added, ā€œThis is for you, John.ā€

Obama placed a congratulatory phone call to Obergefell, which he took amid a throng of reporters outside the courthouse.

Speaking a few minutes later at the White House, Obama praised the decision as an affirmation of the principle that ā€œall Americans are created equal.ā€

The crowd in front of the courthouse at the top of Capitol Hill grew in the minutes following the ruling. The Gay Menā€™s Chorus of Washington, D.C., sang the ā€œStar-Spangled Banner.ā€ Motorists honked their horns in support as they passed by the crowd, which included a smattering of same-sex marriage opponents.

The ruling will not take effect immediately because the court gives the losing side roughly three weeks to ask for reconsideration. But county clerks in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Ohio, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas began issuing licenses to same-sex couples within hours of the decision.

The cases before the court involved laws from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee that define marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Those states have not allowed same-sex couples to marry within their borders, and they also have refused to recognize valid marriages from elsewhere.

Just two years ago, the Supreme Court struck down part of the federal anti-gay marriage law that denied a range of government benefits to legally married same-sex couples.

Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor formed the majority with Kennedy on Friday, the same lineup as two years ago.

The earlier decision in United States v. Windsor did not address the validity of state marriage bans, but courts across the country, with few exceptions, said its logic compelled them to invalidate state laws that prohibited gay and lesbian couples from marrying.

There are an estimated 390,000 married same-sex couples in the United States, according to UCLAā€™s Williams

Institute, which tracks the demographics of gay and lesbian Americans. Another 70,000 couples living in states that do not currently permit them to wed would get married in the next three years, the institute says. Roughly 1 million same-sex couples, married and unmarried, live together in the United States, the institute says.

The Obama administration backed the right of same-sex couples to marry. The Justice Departmentā€™s decision to stop defending the federal anti-marriage law in 2011 was an important moment for gay rights, and Obama declared his support for same-sex marriage in 2012.

The states affected by Fridayā€™s ruling are Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, most of Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas.

___

Associated Press writers Jessica Gresko, Sam Hananel and Glynn Hill contributed to this report.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in