Senator Mike Lee says fact-checking is form of censorship
Republicans argue that liberal voices are ‘censored’ more than liberal ones
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.At Wednesday’s Senate hearing concerning content moderation policies on major social media platforms, Republican Senator Mike Lee said that fact-checking is a form of censorship.
The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation was questioning the CEOs of Twitter, Facebook, and Google via video chat about online censorship, with Republicans voicing concerns that the companies discriminate against conservative viewpoints.
Senator Lee argued that content moderation policies were deployed disproportionately against users with conservative ideologies.
Defining what he meant by censorship, the Utah lawmaker said: “When I use the word 'censor' here, I'm meaning blocked content, fact check, or labeled content, or demonetised websites of conservative, Republican, or pro-life individuals or groups or companies.”
He added that he does not see the same suppression of high-profile liberal groups or individuals.
CEOs Jack Dorsey of Twitter, Sundar Pichai of Google, and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, all defended their policies, stating that they apply to anyone that violates platform rules, no matter their political affiliation.
Incredulous Twitter users were quick to pounce on the idea that a sitting Senator believes that flagging untruths or falsities constitutes censorship. Others declared themselves less surprised.
The hearing was scheduled to discuss Section 230, a law that protects social media companies from being held responsible for any content published on their platforms.
Republican concerns over social media “censorship” were reinvigorated after Twitter limited the sharing of a controversial unverified New York Post story about Hunter Biden's laptop.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments