Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Retired Republican Supreme Court Justice calls for repeal of Second Amendment

He writes that a repeal 'would do more to weaken the NRA's ability to stymie legislative debate' than any available option 

Alexandra Wilts
Washington DC
Tuesday 27 March 2018 17:49 BST
Comments
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has called for the repeal of the Second Amendment
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has called for the repeal of the Second Amendment (Getty Images )

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has called for the repeal of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution – the right to bear arms - saying it “would make our schoolchildren safer” and “honour the memories of... victims of recent gun violence”.

In an comment piece in the New York Times, the 97-year-old argued that the amendment had been warped by gun lobbying groups such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) to extend beyond its original intent.

He pointed out that the amendment was adopted out of “concern that a national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the separate states”.

“Today that concern is a relic of the 18th Century,” said the former justice, a Republican, even though he is widely considered to have been on the liberal side of the highest court in the US at the time of his retirement in 2010.

Mr Stevens was on the losing end of a 2008 ruling in which the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to own a gun for self-defence.

In his opinion piece, Mr Stevens wrote that a constitutional amendment “to get rid of” the Second Amendment “would do more to weaken the NRA’s ability to stymie legislative debate and block constructive gun control legislation than any other available option”.

His comments were largely in response to the March for Our Lives demonstrations last weekend, where hundreds of thousands of people across the country called on members of Congress to pass stricter gun control laws.

The protests were led by students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas, the high school in Parkland, Florida, where a shooter killed 17 people, including 14 students, last month.

“Rarely in my lifetime have I seen the type of civic engagement schoolchildren and their supporters demonstrated in Washington and other major cities throughout the country this past Saturday,” Mr Stevens wrote. “These demonstrations demand our respect.”

But he said they should seek more effective and lasting reform. The demonstrators are currently demanding a prohibition on civilian ownership of semi-automatic weapons, an increase in the minimum age to buy a gun from 18 to 21, and comprehensive background checks on all purchasers of firearms.

Stoneman Douglas student Cameron Kasky, one of the leaders of the March for Our Lives, posted a link to Mr Stevens’ op-ed on Twitter, saying it was “very interesting considering who wrote it”, but “I don’t feel the same way”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in