White House says Michael Wolff 'made up facts to sell a lot of books'
The book's publication has triggered a firestorm in the White House
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The White House - under fire over damaging claims contained in a new publication - has hit out at the author, claiming he “made up a lot of stories to try and sell books”.
The administration has for several days been defending itself against allegations made by Donald Trump’s former strategist Steve Bannon, who suggested the President’s son holding of a meeting with a Russian lawyer was “treasonous”, that his daughter was “dumb as a brick” and that Mr Trump contained no “brain trust”. Mr Trump has responded by saying Mr Bannon had lost his mind after he was sacked.
The White House has also tried to shoot the messenger, claiming Michael Wolff, the author of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, is unreliable. “This is a guy who made up a lot of stories to try and sell books,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told Fox News.
“And more and more people are starting to see that his facts simply don’t add up.”
Ms Sanders said on Friday - the day to which publication of the book had been brought forward - Mr Wolff had spent a lot of time talking to Mr Bannon, Mr Trump’s former top strategist who was fired last August. Yet she claimed people cited in the book had said their words had been misquoted.
“A number of them have said the things that are attributed to them they simply did not say," she said.
“I think that this individual, Michael Wolff, has a long history of not being very credible when it comes to sourcing, when it comes to putting books together.”
Mr Wolff is a veteran New York journalist with a long track record in the business. He is perhaps most famous for his 1988 profile of media mogul Rupert Murdoch - The Man Who Owns the News: Inside the Secret World of Rupert Murdoch.
On Friday, Mr Wolff defended his book, and insisted he did indeed interview Mr Trump, despite the White House’s assertion that the two men had a single, short telephone conversation that was not related to material for the book.
“I absolutely spoke to the President. Whether he realised it was an interview or not I don’t know,” he said on NBC. “But it certainly was not off the record.”
He said he spoke with Mr Trump for a total of about three hours over the course of the presidential campaign and after the inauguration. He added that he has recordings and notes and remains “absolutely in every way comfortable with everything I’ve reported in this book”.
“My credibility is being questioned by a man who has less credibility than, perhaps, anyone who has ever walked on earth,” he said.
Mr Trump tweeted late on Thursday that Mr Wolff’s book was fiction and reliant on fake sources.
“I authorised Zero access to White House (actually turned him down many times) for author of phony book! I never spoke to him for book. Full of lies, misrepresentations and sources that don't exist,” he said.
“Look at this guys past and watch what happens to him and Sloppy Steve.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments