Sally Yates: Former acting attorney general to testify she warned White House about Michael Flynn's Russia links
Hearing could contradict how administration characterised her counsel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former acting attorney general Sally Yates is expected to testify to Congress next week that she expressed alarm to the White House about President Donald Trump's national security adviser's contacts with the Russian ambassador, which could contradict how the administration has characterised her counsel.
Ms Yates is expected to recount her conversation on 26 January about Michael Flynn and to say she was concerned by discrepancies between the administration's public statements on his contacts with ambassador Sergey Kislyak and what really transpired, according to a person familiar with that discussion and knowledgeable about Ms Yates's plans for her testimony.
The person spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to pre-empt the testimony.
Ms Yates is expected to say that she told White House counsel Don McGahn that she believed Mr Flynn's communications with Mr Kislyak could leave Mr Flynn in a compromised position because of the contradictions between the public depictions of the calls and what intelligence officials knew to be true, the person said.
White House officials have said publicly that Ms Yates merely wanted to give them a "heads-up" about Mr Flynn's Russian contacts, but Ms Yates is likely to testify that she approached the White House with alarm, according to the person.
"So just to be clear, the acting attorney general informed the White House counsel that they wanted to give a 'heads up' to us on some comments that may have seemed in conflict with what he had sent the Vice President out in particular," White House press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters at a 14 February press briefing.
Mr Flynn resigned in February after published reports detailed Ms Yates's conversation with the White House. White House officials initially maintained that Mr Flynn had not discussed Russian sanctions with Mr Kislyak during the transition period, but after news reports said the opposite, they then admitted that he had misled them about the nature of that call.
"The issue, pure and simple, came down to a matter of trust," Mr Spicer told reporters.
Mr Flynn was in frequent contact with Mr Kislyak on the day the Obama administration slapped sanctions on Russia for election-related hacking, as well as at other times during the transition period, a US official has said.
Ms Yates's scheduled appearance before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, alongside former national intelligence director James Clapper, will provide her first public account of the conversation with the White House. It will also represent her first testimony before Congress since Ms Yates, an Obama administration holdover, was fired in January for refusing to defend Mr Trump's travel ban.
She was previously scheduled to appear in March before a House committee investigating Russian interference in the presidential election, but that hearing was cancelled.
Associated Press
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments