Republican tax plan 'includes major break for golf course owners'
'Conservation easement' most often used by farmers and other landowners to protect land for future generations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A version of the Republican tax bill reportedly contains a break allowing golf course owners to obtain millions of dollars in relief.
Under what are known as “conservation easements” course owners can write off a proportion of their income for tax purposes, in return for a promise not to build on the land.
Donald Trump has made use of such easements in the past, according to the Wall Street Journal.
The House version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act currently retains the easement for golf courses, Bloomberg reported.
It is used more often by farmers and others whose land is of conservation value, however.
An Obama-era proposal for discontinuing the deduction for golf courses alone suggested it could save the US tens of millions of dollars a year.
The House version of the bill passed through the Ways and Means committee on 9 November.
It must be reconciled with the Senate’s version before it makes its way to Mr Trump’s desk to be signed into law.
Mr Obama’s administration wanted to cut the easement in respect of golf clubs “because it viewed the policy’s costs in total as far exceeding the conservation benefits,” former US Treasury tax lawyer Ruth Madrigal told Bloomberg.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments