Psaki says Republicans ‘obliterate credibility’ with predictions of ‘radical court pick’
Republicans are expected to oppose Joe Biden’s nominee, who would be the first Black woman to serve on the high court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Thursday said Republicans who are predicting the ideological background of President Joe Biden’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer have no idea what they are talking about.
Speaking at her daily briefing with members of the White House press corps, Ms Psaki stressed Mr Biden is “grateful” to Republican senators who have said they will work with him as he vets potential nominees for Mr Breyer’s seat, but warned reporters of “indications” that some in the GOP were already playing “games” by characterising the as-yet undetermined court pick as out of the mainstream.
“We have not mentioned a single name. We have not put out a list. The president made very, very clear he has not made a selection,” she said. “If anyone is saying they plan to characterise whoever he nominates — after thorough consideration with both parties as ‘radical’ — before they knew literally anything about who she is, they just obliterated their own credibility”.
Ms Psaki said Mr Biden’s intention was “not to play games,” but to “consult with members of both parties” before nominating “a qualified candidate, after completing a rigorous process, who is worthy of the excellence and decency of [Mr] Breyer’s legacy”.
She later added that the president “has already started reviewing potential candidates” and reiterated his intent to announce a nominee in February, but would not say whether the White House has any preference as to a specific timeline for the eventual nominee’s confirmation other than “expeditiously”.
“This is nominating someone to serve in a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court. We want that to happen as expeditiously as possible, and we will call out games as we see them,” she said. “But the president's focus is on nominating the right person”.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments