Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

What Project 2025 actually says about birth control is alarming

The Heritage Foundation, which authored Project 2025, even appears to stand against all recreational sex

Alicja Hagopian
Data correspondent
Friday 27 September 2024 18:03
Comments
A protestor holds a sign reading ‘My Body My Choice’ at a Women’s March rally outside the State Capitol on October 8, 2022 in Phoenix, Arizona.
A protestor holds a sign reading ‘My Body My Choice’ at a Women’s March rally outside the State Capitol on October 8, 2022 in Phoenix, Arizona. (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

After Roe v Wade was overturned in 2022, the necessity of free and accessible contraception has been a near-constant talking point.

But the cost of contraception in the US is higher than you might think. Indeed, contraception accounted for 30-44 per cent of out-of-pocket healthcare costs for women before it was covered by the ACA, according to Planned Parenthood.

If the ACA — otherwise known as Obamacare — was overturned, over 62.4 million women would find themselves without access to no-cost birth control, according to the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC); and 48 million women would lose access to free emergency contraception.

At the Trump-Harris debate in Pittsburgh earlier this month, Trump admitted that he had the “concepts of a plan” for healthcare policy to replace the ACA, but nothing concrete.

And earlier in May, Trump said he was “looking at” policy to restrict contraception access in some states, before backpedaling on Truth Social.

Project 2025 — the 900-page policy document from former Trump aides and a right-wing think tank — goes even further, suggesting that the emergency contraceptive (morning after) pill is a “potential abortifacient” and should not be considered contraception under the ACA.

Project 2025 also recommends that the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) should eliminate coverage of emergency contraception altogether under its preventive guidelines.

With an explicit anti-abortion agenda throughout the proposals, Project 2025 also suggests that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should “[r]eturn to being known as the Department of Life by explicitly rejecting the notion that abortion is health care and by restoring its mission statement under the Strategic Plan and elsewhere to include furthering the health and well-being of all Americans ‘from conception to natural death.’”

Although Donald Trump has distanced himself from Project 2025, he has a historical relationship with think-tank The Heritage Foundation and many of its leadership.
Although Donald Trump has distanced himself from Project 2025, he has a historical relationship with think-tank The Heritage Foundation and many of its leadership. (Getty Images)

The slide from abortion bans to contraceptive restrictions is far from over. The Heritage Foundation — the right-wing think tank that authored Project 2025 — appears to stand against all recreational sex.

A video posted on their X (Twitter) account asserts that removing the “senseless use of birth control pills” would “[return] the consequentiality to sex”.

As president, Trump reduced access to contraception for lower-income people by cutting funding for the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program and bringing in restrictions on the Title X program.

He also successfully weakened women’s ability to receive free contraception under the ACA. In 2020, the Supreme Court approved exemptions which would allow employers to deny coverage for birth control for religious or moral objections.

Despite this, Trump has said on his social media platform Truth Social that he would “never, ever advocate imposing restrictions on birth control.”

After his remarks about policy on potentially restricting access to contraception, Mr Trump furiously back-pedaled online, where he labeled reports as a ‘Democrat fabricated lie’
After his remarks about policy on potentially restricting access to contraception, Mr Trump furiously back-pedaled online, where he labeled reports as a ‘Democrat fabricated lie’ (@realDonaldTrump/ Truth Social)

Last year, JD Vance said on CNN that he doesn’t know “any Republican, at least not a Republican with a brain, that’s trying to take [birth control] rights away from people.”

However, 195 Republicans voted agains the Right to Contraception Act in 2022, which would have recognized the legal right to voluntary contraception.

“This election, Americans have a clear choice: give Trump and Vance unlimited power over our bodies and futures by tearing away access to Plan B and birth control and raising health care costs, or elect Vice President Harris and Governor Walz to defend our freedoms and fight to make access to affordable reproductive care a reality for all,” DNC National Press Secretary Emilia Rowland said on Friday.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in