Peter Navarro declines to defend himself in contempt trial
Jury expected to begin deliberations on Thursday
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former Trump adviser Peter Navarro declined to testify in his own defence on Wednesday during his contempt of Congress trial for refusing to cooperate with the January 6 House select committee.
Mr Navarro acted as if he was “above the law” when he ignored a February 2022 subpoena to appear before the committee investigating the Capitol riots, prosecutors said as they opened their case on Wednesday.
The former senior White House trade advisor didn’t ignore the subpoena, but rather told members of the House committee that he was protected by executive privilege, according to an opening statement from his attorney Stanley Woodward.
The trial in Washington DC heard testimony from several January 6 committee staffers, before the prosecution rested its case on Wednesday.
Closing arguments will be heard on Thursday morning before the jury is sent out for deliberations.
Mr Navarro was charged with two counts of contempt of Congress for his refusal to appear for a deposition before the January 6 committee, and for his failure to turn over documents.
The failure to cooperate prevented the committee from uncovering important information about the Capitol riots, Assistant US Attorney John Crabb said in opening arguments, according to the Associated Press.
“Congress believed Navarro had information about what happened on January 6, more specifically on why it happened,” Mr Crabb told the court.
For the defence, Mr Woodward compared the prosecutor’s arguments to a movie trailer that fails to live up to its own hype.
“It’s like one of those movies where you get nothing after the preview,” he said.
A judge has ruled that Mr Navarro’s reliance on executive privilege alone wasn’t a valid defence because he hadn’t produced any evidence that Donald Trump had invoked it.
Mr Navarro, who stood for the entirety of the six-hour hearing, faces up to a year in prison if convicted.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments