Pennsylvania judge strikes down ‘unconstitutional’ coronavirus restrictions
Many restrictions already lifted, but inconsistency in implementation highlighted by judge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal judge has struck down Pennsylvania’s coronavirus pandemic restrictions calling them unconstitutional.
Governor Tom Wolf had implemented limits on the size of gatherings and ordered people to stay home and for “non-life-sustaining” businesses to close in an attempt to stem the spread of Covid-19 infections.
However, on Monday US District Judge William Stickman IV sided with plaintiffs that included hair salons, drive-in movie theatres, a farmer’s market vendor, a horse trainer, and several Republican officeholders who sued as individuals.
Judge Stickman, an appointee of president Donald Trump, ruled that the Wolf administration’s pandemic policies are overreaching, arbitrary and violated citizens’ constitutional rights.
The judge wrote that the governor’s decisions “were undertaken with the good intention of addressing a public health emergency”, but “even in an emergency, the authority of government is not unfettered”.
Many of the restrictions imposed by the governor have been lifted since the lawsuit was filed in May — including the stay-at-home order.
Businesses have also reopened, though capacity limits still apply and there are restrictions on alcohol sales in bars and restaurants.
Indoor events are limited to 25 people and outdoor events to 250 — it was argued in the case that this violates the First Amendment.
Judge Stickman noted that limits on crowd size did no include exceptions for protests, though they had been allowed to proceed. Governor Wolf even participated in a protest that exceeded the limits imposed on gatherings.
While verbal exceptions had been made for the protests, these were not reflected in the language of the governor’s order restricting gatherings.
The judge also pointed out that venue size had not been considered regarding indoor events and some commercial gatherings had been permitted based on percentage occupancy of a location.
In August, president Trump praised his supporters in the state as “incredible people” for defying the shutdown orders and social distancing guidelines at a campaign rally near Scranton.
A spokesperson for the governor said that they are reviewing the judge’s decision.
There have been 145,000 confirmed cases of Covid-19 in the state, and more than 7,800 officially recorded deaths.
With reporting from the Associated Press
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments