US ‘closely monitoring’ national security threat from Russian anti-satellite weapon
White House says the Russian anti-satellite weapon is not currently active and cannot be used against on anything earth-bound
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The United States is “closely monitoring” Russian efforts to develop a new “anti-satellite” weapons capability that so alarmed the leader of the House Intelligence Committee that he went public and described it as a “national security threat,” according to National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby.
The House Intelligence panel chairman, Ohio Representative Mike Turner, drew attention to the threat earlier on Wednesday when he issued an unusually cryptic statement on the “serious national security threat” and called on Mr Biden to “declassify all information relating to this threat so that Congress, the Administration, and our allies can openly discuss the actions necessary to respond to this threat”.
According to ABC News, two sources described the threat at issue as emanating from Russia and involving plans to potentially use space-based nuclear weapons for anti-satellite purposes.
Mr Kirby did not say whether the threat in question was nuclear-based, but he did confirm to reporters at Thursday’s White House press briefing that the threat raised by Mr Turner is “related to an anti-satellite capability that Russia is developing” and confirmed that the weapon in question is “space-based” and if deployed would represent a violation of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty to which both the United States and Russia are signatories.
He took pains to stress that the weapon was not one that Russia could use at this time.
“This is not an active capability that’s been deployed. And though Russia’s pursuit of this particular capability is troubling, there is no immediate threat to anyone’s safety,” he said.
“We are not talking about a weapon that can be used to attack human beings or cause physical destruction here on Earth. That said, we’ve been closely monitoring this Russian activity and we will continue to take it very seriously”.
Mr Kirby told reporters the president has been kept “fully ... and regularly informed” on the developments related to this Russian capability by his national security team, and he stressed that Mr Biden has “directed a series of initial actions” in response, including “additional briefings to congressional leaders, direct diplomatic engagement with Russia, with our allies and our partners as well and with other countries around the world who have interests at stake”.
While White House officials have briefed Mr Turner, House Intelligence Committee ranking member Jim Himes, House Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on the threat, and Mr Turner has in turn allowed each member of the House to view the classified intelligence at issue, Mr Kirby said the Biden administration would not be taking immediate action to declassify the intelligence that Mr Turner thrust into the public eye on Wednesday.
He told reporters that the US Intelligence Community has “serious concerns about a broad declassification of this intelligence,” and he explained that intelligence officials believe “private engagement” would be a better course of action than working swiftly to declassify and publicise the information at issue.
“We make decisions about how and when to publicly disclose intelligence in a careful, deliberate and strategic way, in a way that we choose,” he said. “We’re not going to be knocked off that process, regardless of what in this particular case has found its way into the public domain”.
He added that the administration would “continue to keep members of Congress as well as our international partners and all of you and the American people as fully informed as possible”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments