Trump Jr shares bogus legal interpretation that Nancy Pelosi broke law by tearing up SOTU speech
Bizarre interpretation of a law protecting government records leads to mockery of a pro-Trump political operative on Twitter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump Jr has lent his name and voice to a bogus interpretation of US law that has been used to argue that Nancy Pelosi could be removed from office for tearing up her copy of the president’s State of the Union speech.
The supposed legal interpretation that her destruction of the document is a crime punishable with jail time was seen online shortly after Ms Pelosi’s dramatic move, and promoted by figures like the leader of the far-right group Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk.
Mr Trump Jr, for his part, retweeted a posting about the law — which prohibits removing or destroying government documents — made by Carl Higbie, a pro-Trump political operative who made a name for himself before the current presidency by promoting the racist birther conspiracy that Barack Obama was born in Africa.
“If Trump broke this law the Democrats would try to impeach him,” Mr Trump Jr wrote, referring to his father in a tweet that seems clearly intended to troll Democrats.
By the time the younger Trump invoked 18 U.S.C. § 2071, the idea that it could be applied to the speaker of the House’s actions had been widely criticised and mocked already. Many simply chimed in to call the idea — and those posting about it — “stupid” or a “f*****g dumba**”.
The law prohibits the removal or destruction of any record "filed or deposited with any clerk or officer" of a US court or public office. Ms Pelosi's copy would have been one among many, and not the copy officially filed with the court.
Meanwhile others noted that prosecuting an elected leader for destroying a copy of a speech would necessarily mean that anyone who receives a copy of a speech given in Congress couldn’t toss the document when they were done with it.
“I’ll admit it, I once recycled a hard copy of my boss’s floor speech,” wrote Eric Mee, a communications staffer for Democratic representative Mike Levin, in response to Mr Kirk. “Where do I turn myself in?”
Still others jumped on the idea, and parroted the president’s calls to jail his 2016 political opponent, Hillary Clinton, but with Ms Pelosi as the target.
“Lock her up,” at least one Twitter user wrote, simply.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments