Former EU ambassador and impeachment witness sues Mike Pompeo and government for $1.8m in legal fees
Gordon Sondland accuses former secretary of state of promising to cover attorneys’ fees ahead of bombshell ‘quid pro quo’ testimony
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A key witness from Donald Trump’s first impeachment investigation is suing the federal government and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for $1.8m in legal fees.
Gordon Sondland – whose bombshell testimony accused then-president Trump of offering a “quid pro quo” over military aid to Ukraine in exchange for dirt on Joe Biden and his son Hunter – alleges that Mr Pompeo failed to cover the cost of his legal fees as promised, according to a lawsuit filed in US District Court in Washington DC.
Mr Trump’s former ambassador to the European Union alleges that Mr Pompeo “made a legally binding promise, both individually and on behalf of the government” to pay his attorneys’ fees after he was subpoenaed to appear before a House of Representatives committee.
The former Secretary of State then allegedly “reneged” on the agreement after learning what Mr Sondland intended to tell members of Congress about Mr Trump and his aides and their pressure on Ukraine officials to announce investigations into the Biden family, according to the suit.
In previous testimony, Mr Sondland said he was unaware of the administration’s plans to withhold crucial US military assistance to Ukraine while demanding investigations into Mr Trump’s political revival. But he later submitted a change in his testimony, directly implicating Rudy Giuliani and several Trump administration officials.
Mr Giuliani “was expressing the desires of the president of the United States” when he demanded that Ukraine announce investigations into Mr Biden and the US federal probe into Russian interference in 2016 elections, Mr Sondland said as part of his 17-hour testimony in November 2019.
“We knew that these investigations were important to the president,” Mr Sondland said.
Mr Trump’s energy secretary Rick Perry and special envoy Kurt Volker “worked with Rudy Giuliani on Ukraine matters at the express direction of the president of the United States,” according to Mr Sondland.
“Was there a quid pro quo?” Mr Sondland said during his testimony. “With regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is, ‘Yes.’ ... Everyone was in the loop.”
Mr Trump was impeached in the House but acquitted in the Senate.
Before his meetings with lawmakers, Mr Sondland held a call with Mr Pompeo after he was told that the US Department of Justice and State Department would not represent him at his testimony, according to the suit.
Mr Sondland then retained private counsel for the hearings “to reconstruct all the materials needed and to prepare for this daunting task” throughout an investigation that was “highly fraught, highly charged, and highly risky with tremendous consequences,” according to the lawsuit. Mr Pompeo “promised without any qualification” that his legal fees would be covered, the suit claims.
He was recalled from his position in February 2020, days after Mr Trump’s acquittal.
The lawsuit alleges that the administration told Mr Sondland that it “appreciated his testimony” but “wanted to purge everyone remotely connected” to the impeachment proceedings.
After Mr Sondland refused to resign, “everything changed,” and the government has evaded efforts to recognise the agreement for his legal fees, the lawsuit claims.
A spokesperson for Mr Pompeo told The Independent that the lawsuit is “ludicrous” and that Mr Pompeo “is confident the court will see it the same way.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments