Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Merrick Garland angrily denies ‘outrageous’ GOP claim that he discriminated against Catholics with FBI sting

Republicans frequently clashed with top DoJ official during hearing

Josh Marcus
San Francisco
Thursday 21 September 2023 21:52 BST
Comments
Merrick Garland tells House GOP 'I am not the president's lawyer'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Merrick Garland dismissed claims that he oversaw a Department of Justice that discriminates against Catholics, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee that the suggestion was “outrageous” and “absurd,” given his family’s past fleeing antisemitism in the runup to the Holocaust.

“The idea that someone with my family background would discriminate against any religion is so outrageous, so absurd,” the Attorney General said, becoming emotional at the hearing on Wednesday.

He was responding to a question from Jeff Van Drew, a New Jersey Republican, about whether the DoJ considers traditionalist Catholics to be “extremists,” after an FBI memo revealed earlier this year that the bureau had used at least one undercover agent to collect info on potential links between ultra-traditionalist Catholics and the far-right white nationalist movement.

Merrick Garland testifies before the House of Representatives on Wednesday, 21 September, 2023
Merrick Garland testifies before the House of Representatives on Wednesday, 21 September, 2023 (AP)

“Both I and the director of the FBI have said that they were appalled by that memo,” Mr Garland continued. “Catholics are not extremists, no,” he added.

Earlier in the hearing, he spoke about his family’s background experiencing persecution and how it informs his present work.

“My family fled religious persecution in Eastern Europe at the start of the 20th century. My grandmother, who was one of five children, born in what is now Belarus, made it to the United States, as did two of her siblings,” he said in his opening remarks.

“The other two did not,” he continued. “Those two were killed in the Holocaust. And there is little doubt that, but for America, the same thing would have happened to my grandmother,” he said, appearing to fight back tears. “But this country took her in. And under the protection of our laws, she was able to live without fear of persecution.”

The hearing was filled with such fiery exchanges, including one round of questioning about Republican conspiracy theories regarding Ukraine and Joe Biden that made the attorney general laugh out loud.

Elsewhere in the hearing, the GOP accused Mr Garland of the “weaponisation” of the DoJ to harm Donald Trump and protect Joe and Hunter Biden.

“There’s one investigation protecting President Biden. There’s another one attacking President Trump,” Jim Jordan of Ohio said. “The Justice Department’s got both sides of the equation covered.”

Mr Garland defended his handling of the gun case against Hunter Biden, the president’s son, saying he hadn’t taken orders from the White House or interfered with the work of special counsel David Weiss, a Trump appointee overseeing the case.

“The way to not interfere was to not investigate an investigation,” Mr Garland said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in