Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Maga Republicans try to rewrite what happened on Jan 6 ahead of Trump Supreme Court hearing

Republican congressman Matt Gaetz has introduced a bill to state former president did not engage in an insurrection

Ariana Baio
Tuesday 06 February 2024 20:41 GMT
Comments
Matt Gaetz announces resolution to declare Trump did not engage in an insurrection

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

More than 60 House Republicans have joined a resolution, led by Florida Representative Matt Gaetz, that declares former president Donald Trump did not engage in an insurrection on January 6 – just days before the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case. 

In a heated press conference on Tuesday, Mr Gaetz was joined by several notable Trump-allied Representatives to claim the January 6th attack on the Capitol was not an insurrection, Mr Trump did not engaged in the surrection and that the Colorado Supreme Court erred in their decision to remove the former president from the ballot for engaging in such.

“We are here today to authoritatively express that President Trump did not commit an insurrection and we believe Congress has a unique role in making that declaration,” Mr Gaetz said.

“It’s not the jobs of the state, especially not the job of some bureaucrats in Colorado to make that assessment,” he added.

The resolution, which uses language nearly identical to Section Three of the 14th Amendment, states “President Donald J Trump did not engage in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or give aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

It comes just two days before the Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in the case from Colorado where Mr Trump was disqualified from the ballot for engaging in insurrection.

Mr Gaetz and the group of House Republicans emphasised their point by sharing what they believe to be the actions on January 6 and blamed the media for pushing what they called lies about what actually transpired.

“You’re doing nothing but lying and selling the lies of the Democrats all for campaigns and elections,” Georgie Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene loudly asserted to members of the media on Tuesday.

Missouri Representative Eric Burlison downplayed violence on January 6, saying that the people who came to the Capitol were not armed and only trying to express their First Amendment right.

“It’s your job to make sure that people’s rights aren’t being taken away,” Mr Burlison told the media.

The Department of Justice says that about 140 police officers were injured during fighting with Trump supporters on January 6. At least five people lost their lives, including police officer Brian Sicknick, who suffered two strokes the following day.

The Colorado Supreme Court disqualified Mr Trump from the ballot in December, saying his rheotric leading up and on January 6th incited the mob to storm the Capitol while Congress was trying to certify the 2020 election results.

Under that finding, the state’s supreme court said Mr Trump could not appear on the presidential primary ballot under Section Three, which prohibits officers of the United States from taking office if they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”.

However the Trump-aligned representatives said that January 6 was not an insurrection and any challenges to Mr Trump’s ballot eligibility was a “targeted political witch hunt”.

Among the questions the US Supreme Court may have to answer is whether or not January 6 was an insurrection and if Mr Trump engaged in it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in