Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Liz Cheney says Trump appears to have been ‘personally involved in planning’ 6 Jan insurrection

Bannon ‘appears’ to have had ‘substantial advance knowledge of the plans for January 6th’

Namita Singh
Wednesday 20 October 2021 13:37 BST
Comments
Liz Cheney says Trump appears to have been ‘personally involved in planning and execution of the January 6 insurrection’
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Steve Bannon’s refusal to cooperate in the investigation of the 6 January Capitol riots suggests that former president Donald Trump “was personally involved in the planning and execution” of the insurrection, Liz Cheney said on Tuesday.

The Republican representative’s statement came during a meeting of the House committee investigating the violent insurrection. The committee voted unanimously to hold the former White House advisor in contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena for documents and testimony concerning the attacks.

Ms Cheney, who is the committee’s vice-chair and one of two Republicans serving on it, said their investigation has shown that Mr Bannon “appears” to have had “substantial advance knowledge of the plans for January 6th and likely had an important role in formulating those plans.”

“Mr Bannon was in the war room at the Willard on January 6th.  He also appears to have detailed knowledge regarding the President’s efforts to sell millions of Americans the fraud that the election was stolen,” said the Republican representative from Wyoming.

In its report, the committee argued that Mr Bannon made statements suggesting he knew ahead of time about “extreme events” on 6 January, when Congress was scheduled to certify Democrat Joe Biden as the winner of the presidential election.

In his podcast on 5 January, Mr Bannon said: “All hell is going to break loose tomorrow.” The next day, thousands of Trump supporters descended on the Capitol and clashed with the police. It left five people dead, including a Capitol police officer, while hundreds were injured.

“In the words of many who participated in the January 6th attack, the violence that day was in direct response to President Trump’s repeated claims — from election night through January 6th —that he had won the election,” Ms Cheney added.

American people are entitled to Mr Bannon’s first-hand testimony about all these relevant facts, but Mr Bannon is refusing to provide it, said Ms Cheney. She then added that Mr Bannon’s refusal to comply with the subpoena left the committee “no choice but to seek consequences”.

The conservative podcast host, who served as White House Chief Strategist for seven months in 2017, was served with the subpoena last month, and had been ordered to produce documents and appear for a deposition before the committee on 8 October.

But in a 13 October letter to committee’s chairman, representative Bennie Thompson, Mr Bannon’s attorney, said his client, acting on orders from attorneys for Mr Trump, would “not be producing documents or testimony” until the former president’s executive privilege claim is resolved by a court or through a settlement agreement.

While the legal doctrine of executive privilege protects certain communications between a president and his advisers, the contempt resolution rebuff’s Mr Bannon’s assertion saying he was fired from his White House job in 2017 and was a private citizen when he spoke to Mr Trump ahead of the attack.

Mr Bannon and Mr Trump’s privilege arguments “appear to reveal one thing,” said Ms Cheney. “They suggest that President Trump was personally involved in the planning and execution of January 6th. And this committee will get to the bottom of that.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in