Senator Lindsey Graham defends reference to ‘the good old days of segregation,’ claims he was being sarcastic
‘I want to assure the people of South Carolina, that statement was made with dripping sarcasm’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham has quickly defended controversial comments he made during the third day of confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, in which he referenced “the good old days of segregation”.
The Republican senator spoke to reporters immediately after calling a lunch breaking at the Wednesday hearings and said his question to the nominee was “dripping in sarcasm”.
Mr Graham was questioning Judge Barrett, President Donald Trump’s third nomination to the nation’s highest court, when he said: “You're not aware of any effort to go back to the good old days of segregation by a legislative body, is that correct?"
His words sparked swift backlash online, which seemingly caused Mr Graham to address the reporters waiting outside of the room where the committee’s hearings were underway.
“If anybody was listening to who I am and what I said, you know that it was with deep sarcasm that I suggested that I suggested that some legislative body would want to yearn for the good old days of segregation”, he said, speaking behind a face mask.
“The point that I’m trying to make is there’s nobody in America, in the legislative arena wanting to take us back to that dark period in American history,” he continued. “And for my opponent to suggest that says far more about him than me.”
The senator continued: "Manufacturing a scenario that Lindsey Graham wants to go back to the days of segregation is not worthy of the times in which we live, it is not worthy of an assault on me … I want to assure the people of South Carolina, that statement was made with dripping sarcasm.”
By his “opponent”, the senator was referring to Jaime Harrison, the Democratic senatorial candidate vying to unseat him in South Carolina, who tweeted a clip of Mr Graham’s comments during the live hearings.
Tagging Mr Graham, the Democrat wrote: “@LindseyGrahamSC just called segregation “the good old days.” The good old days for who, Senator?”
“It’s 2020, not 1920,” he added. “Act like it.”
Though campaign politics is typically left out of judicial committee hearings, the senator addressing his opponent during the break appeared to show how tense the race has gotten for Mr Graham as he seeks re-election.
Mr Harrison has raised a staggering $57 million in the third quarter, shattering fundraising records for a senatorial race as polls show him closing in on the Republican incumbent.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments