Katie Hill says judge ‘thinks revenge porn is free speech’ in reaction to Daily Mail ruling
‘This fight has massive implications for any woman who ever wants to run for office,’ she says
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Katie Hill has accused a judge of equating revenge porn with free speech in reaction to the dismissal of her case against The Daily Mail for publishing unauthorised nude photos of her on its website.
The lawsuit, filed by the former California representative was dismissed on Wednesday by a judge who said the tabloid was protected under the First Amendment when it published the photos.
The judge noted that she accepted The Mail’s argument that the publication of the photos was "a matter of public issue or public interest.”
Ms Hill released a statement on Twitter in response to the ruling saying: “Today, we lost in court because a judge - not a jury - thinks revenge porn is free speech.”
She added: “This fight has massive implications for any woman who ever wants to run for office, so quitting isn’t an option.”
Read more:
- Baltimore ends war on drugs with plot line straight from The Wire
- 246 fully vaccinated Michigan residents test positive for Covid and three die
- Entire flight deplaned over ‘maskless toddler’
- Secret Service daughter goes viral on TikTok by sharing tips her father gives her
- DMX’s manager says rapper is on life support in coma
Ms Hill’s lawyer, Carrie Goldberg, indicated that the former representative would appeal, saying “DM said, and the court agreed, that Katie’s nudes were their free speech. We think the appellate court will disagree.”
The 33-year-old has also sued her ex-husband, Kenneth Heslep, and conservative news site redstate.com, alleging they distributed “nonconsensual porn” that helped derail her political career.
According to The Hill, the suit specifically named Salem Media Group Inc, Mail Media Inc and Ms Hill’s ex-husband, Kenny Heslep.
Mr Heslep, denies leaking the photos and has said a computer hack led to the release of the suggestive photos.
“We’re up against a deeply misogynistic system that has to change, and it won’t until we force it to,” Ms Hill said in conclusion to her statement.
The 33-year-old resigned from Congress in 2019 after the nude pictures of her and an aide were leaked.
She acknowledged having an inappropriate affair with a female campaign aide but denied allegations of a relationship with a male congressional staffer which would have violated House rules.
The Independent has contacted The Mail for comment.
Additional reporting by the Associated Press
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments