Hunter Biden files then withdraws motion for new trial on federal gun charges
President’s sole surviving son was convicted on three felony counts in June
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Attorneys for Hunter Biden want a new trial for the incumbent president’s son, they argued in a motion filed Monday that a federal court in Delaware did not have jurisdiction to hear the case. The motion, however, was quickly withdrawn by the counsel, leaving open the possibility that it will be re-filed with corrections later.
Hunter Biden, 54, was convicted on all three counts against him after just a short deliberation by jurors last week. He was charged with lying on an application for the purchase of a firearm by omitting his history of drug abuse on the paperwork.
In the original filing of the application, lawyers for the younger Biden argued that the appeals court had not issued the order denying their client’s appellate bid to have the charges dismissed.
Penned by Abbe Lowell, it stated that “the Third Circuit, however, did not then and has not yet issued its mandate as to the orders dismissing either appeal, Thus, when this Court empaneled the jury on June 3, 2024 and proceeded to trial, it was without jurisdiction to do so.”
The Independent has reached out to Hunter Biden’s attorneys for comment.
The effort by Hunter Biden to play legal checkers with his conviction presents yet another awkward situation for the White House and the presidential campaign of Joe Biden, which are confronted by the realities of the conduct of the president’s adult son and his efforts to dodge the repercussions of a deception which many of Biden’s own supporters say that Hunter is obviously guilty of committing. It couldn’t come at a worse time for the incumbent president, who is seeking to distinguish himself from his 2024 opponent Donald Trump and the 34 felony counts on which Trump was just convicted in New York.
Joe Biden has publicly said that he would not pardon his son were he to be convicted (and the convictions upheld.) He has faced questions from reporters regarding whether he’d work around that promise by commuting his son’s sentence, which has not yet been set by a judge.
“I will accept the outcome of this case and will continue to respect the judicial process as Hunter considers an appeal,” the president said in a statement last week. “Jill and I will always be there for Hunter and the rest of our family with our love and support.”
Hunter added in his own statement after the conviction: “I am more grateful today for the love and support I experienced this last week from Melissa, my family, my friends, and my community than I am disappointed by the outcome. Recovery is possible by the grace of God, and I am blessed to experience that gift one day at a time.”
The president’s son has long been a bogeyman for the Republican Party, which has sought to paint the Biden family as corrupt and guilty of various crimes. They have done so even as the GOP’s standard-bearer, Trump, has increasingly become mired in his own scandals and legal troubles.
Ariana Baio contributed to reporting