Diabetic Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor forced to work remotely because Gorsuch refuses to wear mask
Sotomayor has type one diabetes.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch’s refusal to wear a mask during in-person arguments has meant fellow Justice Sonia Sotomayor had to work remotely during arguments, NPR reported.
This comes despite the fact the Supreme Court refused to block a federal mask mandate for air travel.
Mr Gorsuch, whom former president Donald Trump nominated, refused to wear a mask while Ms Sotomayor, whom former president Barack Obama nominated, participated in arguments with a microphone setup in her office. Mr Gorsuch has been captured in images being the only justice to not wear a mask on the bench.
Ms Sotomayor has type 1 diabetes, which puts her at risk for serious illness from Covid-19 or even death. Mr Gorsuch also happens to sit next to Ms Sotomayor on the bench.
Similarly, Ms Sotomayor has not been able to attend the weekly conferences among the justices in-person, instead participating by phone.
Last week, the US Supreme Court ruled against the Biden administration’s vaccinate-or-test mandate that required employers that hire 100 or more people to either receive a vaccination against Covid-19 or subject to weekly testing. The Supreme Court’s six conservative justices argued that Covid-19 was not a risk specific to work.
“Although Covid-19 is a risk that occurs in many workplaces, it is not an occupational hazard in most,” the court said in its majority opinion, saying rather that the virus is a “universal risk” people face in homes, schools and in the workplace.
At the same time, the Supreme Court rejected a request to block mask mandates for air travel brought by a father on behalf of himself and his autistic son.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments